GSD-2023-1001884 arm64: dts: imx8mm-verdin: Do not power down eth-phy

arm64: dts: imx8mm-verdin: Do not power down eth-phy This is an automated ID intended to aid in discovery of potential security vulnerabilities. The actual impact and attack plausibility have not yet been proven. This ID is fixed in Linux Kernel version v6.1.11 by commit...

PT-2023-34960 · Linux · Linux Kernel

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Linux Kernel versions prior to v6.1.11 Description: The issue is related to the arm64 device tree for imx8mm-verdin, where the eth-phy is not properly powered down. This problem was introduced in version v5.18 and is fixed in version v6.1.11...

sr.ethz.ch Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3185333

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

PYSEC-2023-39

OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for secure smart contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. isvalidethsignature is missing a call to finalizekeccak after calling verifyethsignature. As a result, any contract using isvalidethsignature from the...

Caller.callBatched doesn't enforce msg.value is equal to sum of call values

Lines of code Vulnerability details For each call in callBatched, we pass a value to be sent along with the call: for uint256 i = 0; i calls.length; i++ Call memory call = callsi; returnDatai = callsender, call.to, call.data, call.value; The sum of the values of the calls should be equal to...

ANYONE CAN STEAL ETH THROUGH METHODS IN Payment.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In Payment.sol contract, there is no access control on unwrapWETH, sweepToken and refundETH. So anyone can call these method to steal the Eth. Proof of Concept File: src/periphery/Payment.sol function unwrapWETHuint256 amountMinimum, address recipient...

Anyone can withdraw all the ETH sent to Payment contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone can withdraw all the ETH sent to Payment contract Proof of Concept 1. Someone send ETH to Payment contract 2. Attacker will call refundETH 3. Payment contract will transfer all ETH to attacker's address Tools Used Manual Analysis --- The text was...

Galaxy Technologies GNS3 安全漏洞

Galaxy Technologies GNS3 is a suite of network software emulators from Galaxy Technologies, USA. A security vulnerability exists in Galaxy Technologies GNS3 dynamips version 0.2.21, which originates from the use of uninitialized variables in the function genethrecv...

Expert Analysis Reveals Cryptographic Weaknesses in Threema Messaging App

A comprehensive analysis of the cryptographic protocols used in the Swiss encrypted messaging application Threema has revealed a number of loopholes that could be exploited to break authentication protections and even recover users' private keys. The seven attacks span three different threat...

Any user which holds Raes tokens can infinitely freeze NFT in OptimisticListingSeaport

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description OptimisticListingSeaport exposes propose method to create new proposal, and rejectProposal to remove a listing in proposal stage. In propose, proposer commits a certain amount of collateral: // Sets collateral amount to pending balances for withdraw...

MISSING HANDLE FOR DIRECT SEND OF TOKEN

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current implementation of the protocol does not handle situations when tokens are sent directly to the pair contract. Tokens directly send to the contract can affect the calculation of baseTokenReserves which affect buyQuoute and sellQuoute. Below is...

GroupBuy can be drained of all ETH.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description purchase in GroupBuy faciilitates the purchasing of an NFT after enough contributions were gathered. Another report titled "Attacker can steal the amount collected so far in the GroupBuy for NFT purchase" describes a high impact bug in purchase. It ...

contribute() locks too much ETH from the user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the contribute function of the GroupBuy contract, even if the filledQuantity is less than quantity, all the ETH provided by the user is locked in the contract, and the user can only call claim to get it back after purchasing NFT or Pool expires, which...

User can provide malicious _market in GroupBuy.purchase to steal funds or NFT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The argument market of GroupBuy.purchase is not validated. The following call is directly performed on it: address vault = IMarketBuyermarket.executevalue: pricepurchaseOrder; Then, it is checked that the returned address owns the NFT: if...

GroupBuy does not check return value of call

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Both usages of call do not check if the transfer of ETH was succesful: payablemsg.sender.callvalue: contribution""; ... payablemsg.sender.callvalue: balance""; This can become very problematic when the recipient is a smart contract that reverts for...

Lack of access control for sweepToken, refundETH, unwrapWETH9 in Router.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of access control for sweepToken, refundETH, unwrapWETH9 in Router.sol, any WETH token, ETH and ERC20 sent to Router.sol is lost and claimable to anyone. Proof of Concept the function unwrapWETH9 and sweepToken and refundETH has no access control an...

wrong configuration can lock eth in LPDA contract forever

Lines of code Vulnerability details When creating an LPDA auction there are some sanity checks of the values used for the auction. But there is no check that the auction will not cause the price calculation to underflow after a while. This calculation of the price can underflow in getPrice in...

Loss of ETH for NFT buyers in LPDA contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The buy function of LPDA sale contract can be invoked with 0 as the input value and 0 ETH as the sent valuemsg.value = 0. The buy function automatically ends the sale when newId == sale.finalId and distributes ETH to feeReceiver and saleReceiver. Since t...

Malicious feeReceiver or saleReceiver can steal the user's refund ETH by calling the buy function multiple times in LPDA

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the LPDA contract, the fee is transfered to feeReceiver and the totalSale to saleReceiver when newId == temp.finalId, meaning that the amount of tokens that were minted has been reached. However, the call to the internal end function only emits an eve...

Missing msg.value when executing the cross-chain request

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact the cross-chain request will not support smart contract that requires ETH payment in destination chain on execution side. Proof of Concept When a user relayers call and performs a cross-chain request, the executor needs to execute the request in the...