GeVault cannot deposit ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The GeVault contract has two instances where the require statement for token validation can cause reverts. In the first instance, the contract allows only token0 and token1 addresses for withdrawal, making it impossible to withdraw ETH. In the second...

call() should be used instead of transfer() on an address payable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The use of the transfer function for sending ETH to an address will inevitably make the transaction fail when: The claimer smart contract does not implement a payable function. The claimer smart contract does implement a payable fallback which uses more...

RETURN VALUE OF LOW LEVEL call FUNCTION IS NOT CHECKED FOR SUCCESFUL VALUE TRANSFER

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The V3Proxy.swapTokensForExactETH and V3Proxy.swapExactTokensForETH functions use the low level call function to transfer Eth to the msg.sender as shown below: payablemsg.sender.callvalue: amountOut""; But there is no verification of the return value of...

Deposit will always revert when depositing ETH if one of the GeVault tokens is not WETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user deposits funds, the deposit function requires an argument namely, the address of the token with which to fund the transaction. If the GeVault has two tokens of for example: USDC/DAI. Line 251 expects the function argument to be the address of...

Inflation attacks with virtual shares and assets on GeVault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An inflation attacks can be done on the first deposit into the GeVault contract. Making the first real depositor losing his deposit. Proof of Concept Inflation attack steps : First, Alice the attacker need to craft a deposit that put valueX8 = 1 = Thus...

In the BaseTOFT, removeCollateral(), any marketHelper can be specified, allowing all the ETH to be stolen from a mTapiocaOFT with ETH as erc

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact All the ETH in mTapiocaOFT can be stolen, which is relevant when the underlying asset erc is ETH. Proof of Concept mTapiocaOFT allows removing collateral from Singularity through a cross chain call, but the address of the MarketHelper is not validated. T...

Calc token amount can be manipulated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact function calcDepositInOneCoin uint2563 memory arr private view returns uint256 return liquidityPool.calctokenamountarr, true; This function is being used to calculate slippage, return value calctokenamount can be manipulated as described in POC section,...

_sendToken in tapiocaz::Balancer::rebalance() not sending native fee will lead to revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact function sendToken address payable oft, uint256 amount, uint16 dstChainId, uint256 slippage, bytes memory data private IERC20Metadata erc20 = IERC20MetadataITapiocaOFToft.erc20; if erc20.balanceOfaddressthis amount revert ExceedsBalance; uint256 srcPoolI...

CBEthCollateral and AnkrStakedEthCollateral _underlyingRefPerTok is incorrect

Lines of code Vulnerability details The CBEthCollateral.underlyingRefPerTok function just uses CBEth.exchangeRate to get the ref/tok rate. The CBEth.exchangeRate can only get the conversion rate from cbETH to staked ETH2 on the coinbase. However as the docs...

manipulate rate

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact using spot price as the exchange rate can be manipulated. Proof of Concept 1. attacker manipulates the balancer pool making eth very expensive 2. By calling the updateCache function, the attacker updates the cachedCalculatedAmount based on the manipulate...

CurveVolatileCollateral._underlyingRefPerTok() Possible manipulation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact curvePool.getvirtualprice May be manipulated to cause malicious entry DISABLED Proof of Concept CurveVolatileCollateral.underlyingRefPerTok return curvePool.getvirtualprice function underlyingRefPerTok internal view virtual override returns uint192 @...

GHSA-RRXV-Q8M4-WCH3 .eth registrar controller can shorten the duration of registered names

Description According to the documentation, controllers are allowed to register new domains and extend the expiry of existing domains, but they cannot change the ownership or reduce the expiration time of existing domains. However, a preliminary analysis suggests that an attacker-controlled...

.eth registrar controller can shorten the duration of registered names

Description According to the documentation, controllers are allowed to register new domains and extend the expiry of existing domains, but they cannot change the ownership or reduce the expiration time of existing domains. However, a preliminary analysis suggests that an attacker-controlled...

Attacker can Steal all eths of WETHRouter.sol through redeem function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can Steal eths through redeem function in WETHRouter.sol as you know the contract does the redeem process and redeem user mTokens to ETHs, and as you know we have the function of mint which is the opposite of this and users deposit ETH in ord...

withdrawFees Have a vulnerability leading to

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Thé withdrawFees function allows the manager to withdraw all ETH fees from the contract., this function uses the transfer method here the vulnerable part: function withdrawFeesaddress recipient external onlyRoleBADGEMANAGERROLE if recipient == address0...

A user could call mint() with less ETH than the mintPrice and improperly mint badges for a cheaper cost.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact users underpaying to mint badges will lead to loss of funds Proof of Concept It checks if msg.value is less than the required mintPrice, but it does not check for the case where msg.value mintPrice. This means: A user could send only 1 wei when the...

InterchainProposalExecutor will fail if any proposal requires value transfer, breaking core logic

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Proposals which are sent from a source chain using InterchainProposalSender to a destination chain to be executed using InterchainProposalExecutor are intended to support function calls that include transfers of ETH, or other native token. However, the...

Voter/caller's eth will be stuck in contracts if the proposal fails to pass

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Voters of AxelarServiceGovernance.sol:executeMultisigProposal or callers of Multisig.sol:execute will have their eth stuck in the contract if they can't make the proposal/call pass the vote count checks in onlySigners. Proof of Concept...

Unauthorized Withdrawal of ETH by Admin in _withdraw.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker with admin privileges can maliciously execute the withdraw function, resulting in the unauthorized withdrawal of all the ETH in the contract. Proof of Concept withdrawNounsDAOStorageV3.StorageV3 storage ds external onlyAdminds returns uint256...

ETH might stuck in NounsDAOProxy.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact NounsDAOProxy.fallback and NounsDAOProxy.receive expect to receive ETH, but the contract and its implementation don't contain a function to withdraw the received ETH as NounsDAOLogicV3.withdraw and NounsDAOLogicV2.withdraw Proof of Concept In...