881 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
openshift-ansible before versions 3.9.23, 3.7.46 deploys a misconfigured etcd file that causes the SSL client certificate authentication to be disabled. Quotations around the values of ETCDCLIENTCERTAUTH and ETCDPEERCLIENTCERTAUTH in etcd.conf result in etcd being configured to allow remote users...
CVE-2018-1085
CVE-2018-1085 affects OpenShift OpenShift-ansible deployments: OpenShift Ansible before 3.9.23 and 3.7.46 deploys etcd with a misconfigured etcd.conf where ETCD_CLIENT_CERT_AUTH and ETCD_PEER_CLIENT_CERT_AUTH values are quoted, causing SSL client certificate authentication to be disabled. This en...
CVE-2018-1085
openshift-ansible before versions 3.9.23, 3.7.46 deploys a misconfigured etcd file that causes the SSL client certificate authentication to be disabled. Quotations around the values of ETCDCLIENTCERTAUTH and ETCDPEERCLIENTCERTAUTH in etcd.conf result in etcd being configured to allow remote users...
Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)
github.com/coreos/etcd is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery CSRF attacks. The vulnerability exists as there are no host whitelists in place to prevent unauthorized websites from sending unauthorized POST requests to the etcd server...
DNS Rebinding
github.com/coreos/etcd is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. The vulnerability exists because it does not prevent the attacker to use its DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
CVE-2018-1098
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
UBUNTU-CVE-2018-1098
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
Cross site request forgery (csrf)
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
CVE-2018-1099
DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
DEBIAN-CVE-2018-1098
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
CVE-2018-1098
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
CVE-2018-1099
DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
UBUNTU-CVE-2018-1099
DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
Design/Logic Flaw
DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
CVE-2018-1098
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
CVE-2018-1099
DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
CVE-2018-1099
DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost or any other address...
CVE-2018-1098
A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe can't PUT from an HTML form or such but POST allows creating...
CVE-2018-1098
CVE-2018-1098 affects etcd 3.3.1 and earlier, where CSRF allows an attacker to induce the etcd server to perform unauthorized actions by sending crafted POST requests via a malicious site. The description notes that PUT is safer for adding keys, but POST can be used to create in-order keys. The N...
CVE-2018-1099
CVE-2018-1099 is a DNS rebinding vulnerability in etcd (versions up to 3.3.1). The issue allows an attacker to manipulate DNS records to rebind DNS entries, enabling unintended access to DNS records. Connected documents corroborate the same CVE with details and reference IBM/astral bulletin cover...