CVE-2018-12070

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...

CVE-2018-12081

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12083

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12079

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Design/Logic Flaw

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Information disclosure

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Design/Logic Flaw

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12078

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable...

Buffer overflow

The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...

CVE-2018-12082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12080

The CVE describes a vulnerability in the Internet Node Token (INT) ERC20 contract where the mintToken function has no period constraint. This allows the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply, enabling potential profit manipulation. Documents confirm the affected component is the mintToken fu...

CVE-2018-12068

The CVE-2018-12068 issue concerns a math overflow in the sell() function of the Target Coin (TGT) ERC20 contract. The vulnerability arises from overflow in multiplying the argument amount by a manipulable sellPrice, enabling a potential trap (tradeTrap) that could cause financial damage to the se...

CVE-2018-12070

The CVE-2018-12070 entry concerns the sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, an Ethereum ERC20 token. The issue is an overflow in the multiplication of the argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, described as the tradeTrap. This overflow could be exploited to caus...

CVE-2018-12067

Summary: CVE-2018-12067 affects Substratum (SUB), an Ethereum ERC20 token. Multiple sources describe a vulnerability in the tradeTrap mechanism: the sell function can overflow due to the multiplication of the input amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, enabling a potential financial loss t...

CVE-2018-12084

The CVE-2018-12084 case concerns BitAsean (BAS), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token. The vulnerability resides in the smart-contract mintToken function, which has no period/expiration constraint, enabling the owner to arbitrarily inflate the total supply and profit. Documents confirm the issue as th...