97 matches found
CVE-2018-17111
The onlyOwner modifier of a smart contract implementation for Coinlancer CL, an Ethereum ERC20 token, has a potential access control vulnerability. All contract users can access functions that use this onlyOwner modifier, because the comparison between msg.sender and owner is incorrect...
Integer overflow
An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red BTCR, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the...
CVE-2018-11687
An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red BTCR, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the...
CVE-2018-11687
An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red BTCR, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the...
CVE-2018-11561
CVE-2018-11561 affects the EETHER ERC20 smart contract; an integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function enables an attacker to illegitimately increase their digital assets. The vulnerability is described in multiple sources (NVD/CNVD) as a token-amount overflow in the distributeTo...
MalaysianCoin Integer Overflow Vulnerability
MalaysianCoin is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the transferAny function of MalaysianCoin's smart contract implementation. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to set the balance of an arbitrary user...
CVE-2018-12230
An wrong logical check identified in the transferFrom function of a smart contract implementation for RemiCoin RMC, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the attacker to steal tokens or conduct resultant integer underflow attacks...
Aurora IDEX Membership(IDXM), ERC20 Token, allows attackers to acquire contract ownership (CVE-2018–10666)
Abstract I found a new vulnerability in smart contract of IDXM Token CVE-2018–106661. Attackers can acquire contract ownership because the setOwner function is delcared as public. A new owner can subsequently bypass intended access restrictions by, for example, calling uploadBalances. Details In...
CVE-2018-13202
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for MyBO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets...
EnterToken Integer Overflow Vulnerability
EnterToken is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the sell function of EnterToken's smart contract implementation where "amount sellPrice" can be zero. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to reduce the seller's assets...
MODI Token Integer Overflow Vulnerability
MODI Token MODI is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the mintToken function of MODI Token's smart contract implementation. The vulnerability can be exploited by the contract owner to set the balance of any user to any value...
Reimburse Token Integer Overflow Vulnerability
Reimburse Token REIM is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the mintToken function of Reimburse Token's smart contract implementation. The vulnerability can be exploited by the contract owner to set the balance of any user to any value...
CVE-2018-13041
The mint function of a smart contract implementation for Link Platform LNK, an Ethereum ERC20 token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
Buffer overflow
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...
CVE-2018-12079
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12081
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12083
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Buffer overflow
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...
Buffer overflow
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable...
Design/Logic Flaw
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...