7 matches found
RHSA-2013:0220 Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 1.1 update
Bulletin has no description...
SUSE CVE-2011-3872
Puppet 2.6.x before 2.6.12 and 2.7.x before 2.7.6, and Puppet Enterprise PE Users 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 before 1.2.4, when signing an agent certificate, adds the Puppet master's certdnsnames values to the X.509 Subject Alternative Name field of the certificate, which allows remote attackers to spoof ...
mailenable-imap-examine.py.txt
!/usr/bin/python Remote Mailenable Enterprise 1.1 EXAMINE buffer Overflow Discovered and exploited by [email protected] This vulnerability affects Mailenable Enterprise 1.1 without the ME-10009.EXE patch. Details: SEH gets overwritten at 965 968 in VMWare bytes in the EXAMINE command. Filteri...
CVE-2005-4457
CVE-2005-4457 affects MailEnable Enterprise 1.1 prior to patch ME-10009. The issue allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and potentially execute arbitrary code via several triple-dot sequences in a UID FETCH command. Impact is limited to the described exposure in MailEnable...
[Full-disclosure] [ACSSEC-2005-11-27-0x2] Remote Overflows in Mailenable Enterprise 1.1 / Professional 1.7
Re: See-Security Research and Development "A remote buffer overflow exists in MailEnable Enterprise 1.1 IMAP EXAMINE command, which allows for post authentication code execution. This vulnerability affects Mailenable Enterprise 1.1 without the ME-10009.EXE patch." -- There's a reason why the...
MailEnable Enterprise Edition 1.1 (EXAMINE) Buffer Overflow Exploit
No description provided by source. !/usr/bin/python Remote Mailenable Enterprise 1.1 EXAMINE buffer Overflow Discovered and exploited by [email protected] This vulnerability affects Mailenable Enterprise 1.1 without the ME-10009.EXE patch. Details: SEH gets overwritten at 965 968 in VMWare...
CVE-2005-3813
IMAP service meimaps.exe of MailEnable Professional 1.7 and Enterprise 1.1 allows remote authenticated attackers to cause a denial of service application crash by using RENAME with a non-existent mailbox, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-3690...