26820 matches found
CVE-2024-1638
The documentation specifies that the BTGATTPERMREADLESC and BTGATTPERMWRITELESC defines for a Bluetooth characteristic: Attribute read/write permission with LE Secure Connection encryption. If set, requires that LE Secure Connections is used for read/write access, however this is only true when i...
Design/Logic Flaw
The documentation specifies that the BTGATTPERMREADLESC and BTGATTPERMWRITELESC defines for a Bluetooth characteristic: Attribute read/write permission with LE Secure Connection encryption. If set, requires that LE Secure Connections is used for read/write access, however this is only true when i...
CVE-2024-1638 Bluetooth characteristic LESC security requirement not enforced without additional flags
The documentation specifies that the BTGATTPERMREADLESC and BTGATTPERMWRITELESC defines for a Bluetooth characteristic: Attribute read/write permission with LE Secure Connection encryption. If set, requires that LE Secure Connections is used for read/write access, however this is only true when i...
CVE-2024-1638 Bluetooth characteristic LESC security requirement not enforced without additional flags
The documentation specifies that the BTGATTPERMREADLESC and BTGATTPERMWRITELESC defines for a Bluetooth characteristic: Attribute read/write permission with LE Secure Connection encryption. If set, requires that LE Secure Connections is used for read/write access, however this is only true when i...
CVE-2024-1638
CVE-2024-1638 concerns Bluetooth LE GATT permission checks in Zephyr and related disclosures. The issue is that the BT_GATT_PERM_READ_LESC and BT_GATT_PERM_WRITE_LESC flags are intended to require LE Secure Connections for read/write access, but only when used with additional permissions (BT_GATT...
EU Court of Human Rights Rejects Encryption Backdoors
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that breaking end-to-end encryption by adding backdoors violates human rights: Seemingly most critically, the Russian government told the ECHR that any intrusion on private lives resulting from decrypting messages was "necessary" to combat terrorism in...
CVE-2024-1344
CVE-2024-1344 affects LaborOfficeFree v19.10. The vulnerability allows reading/extracting database usernames and passwords from the LOF_service.exe/LaborOfficeFree.exe databases located under %programfiles(x86)%. An attacker could log in remotely with root-like privileges. Affected executables LO...
CVE-2022-48625
Concerning CVE-2022-48625, the vulnerability affects Yealink Config Encrypt Tool versions prior to 1.2, which ships with a built‑in RSA key pair. This design enables potential decryption of encrypted deployment files by an adversary using the default key. The impact is a decryption risk (per the ...
PT-2024-3658 · Ge Healthcare · Ge Healthcare Echopac
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: GE HealthCare EchoPAC products affected versions not specified Description: The issue concerns vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products, which is related to the lack of encryption measures. This could allow a remote attack...
CVE-2023-46809
A flaw was found in Node.js. The privateDecrypt API of the crypto library may allow a covert timing side-channel during PKCS1 v1.5 padding error handling. This issue revealed significant timing differences in decryption for valid and invalid ciphertexts, which may allow a remote attacker to decry...
CVE-2023-40104
In ca-certificates, there is a possible way to read encrypted TLS data due to untrusted cryptographic certificates. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...
CVE-2023-6937
wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...
CVE-2023-6937 Improper (D)TLS key boundary enforcement
wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...
CVE-2023-6937
wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...
CVE-2023-6937
Summary: CVE-2023-6937 affects wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6, where messages within a single (D)TLS record were not checked for crossing key boundaries. This allows combining messages encrypted under different keys into one record, with a notable edge case in (D)TLS 1.3 where an unencrypted server fligh...
Rhysida Ransomware’s Decryptor is Now in Action
Summary: The Rhysida ransomware-as-a-service RaaS group poses a significant global threat, targeting diverse sectors. Recently, an implementation vulnerability in the source code of the Rhysida ransomware has been discovered. By exploiting this vulnerability to reconstruct encryption keys, it...
CVE-2023-4538
The database access credentials configured during installation are stored in a special table, and are encrypted with a shared key, same among all Comarch ERP XL client installations. This could allow an attacker with access to that table to retrieve plain text passwords. This issue affects ERP XL...
Code injection
The database access credentials configured during installation are stored in a special table, and are encrypted with a shared key, same among all Comarch ERP XL client installations. This could allow an attacker with access to that table to retrieve plain text passwords. This issue affects ERP XL...
CVE-2023-4538 Shared Key in Comarch ERP XL
The database access credentials configured during installation are stored in a special table, and are encrypted with a shared key, same among all Comarch ERP XL client installations. This could allow an attacker with access to that table to retrieve plain text passwords. This issue affects ERP XL...
CVE-2023-4538 Shared Key in Comarch ERP XL
The database access credentials configured during installation are stored in a special table, and are encrypted with a shared key, same among all Comarch ERP XL client installations. This could allow an attacker with access to that table to retrieve plain text passwords. This issue affects ERP XL...