Lucene search
+L

898 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/06/26 12:00 a.m.28 views

Upgraded Q -> H from 222 [1656255302682]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 222 as High risk. The relevant finding follows: L-02 totalAssets of erc4626 should never revert eip-4626 According to the spec, totalAssets of erc4626 should never revert MUST NOT revert. wfcash would revert if it's matured but hasn't settled...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/06/22 12:00 a.m.22 views

use ECDSA helper library instead of ecrecover

Lines of code Vulnerability details use ECDSA helper library instead of ecrecover the function permit adds approval for a spender for a certain amount of value use of ecrecover to validate signatures without a nonce will allow signatures to be replayed to add additional approvals due to signature...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/06/12 12:00 a.m.19 views

Deposit of wrappedFCash does not follow EIP 4626

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The deposit of wfCashERC4626 is not 4626 compatible. wfCashERC4626.solL168-L175 According to EIP4626 MUST revert if all of assets cannot be deposited due to deposit limit being reached, slippage, the user not approving enough underlying tokens to the Vau...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/06/03 12:00 a.m.20 views

Integer Overflow in Nonce Possible Via EIP 1271 Compliant Contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current NonceManager deployed version does not expect a nonce to go as high to actually trigger an integer overflow and is therefore, unchecked. However, it is completely possible to have the nonce go as high with EIP 1271 contracts that hold the NFT...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/05/07 12:00 a.m.22 views

CNft.sol - revert inside safeTransferFrom will break composability & standard behaviour

Lines of code Vulnerability details The function safeTransferFrom is a standard interface in ERC1155, and its expected to succeed if all the parametes are valid, and revert on error, which is not the case here so its a deviation. Refer to the EIP-1155 safeTransferFrom rules: MUST revert if to is...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/04/19 12:00 a.m.16 views

StakedCitadel should implement EIP-4626

Lines of code Vulnerability details StakedCitadel should implement EIP-4626 StakedCitadel could be seen as an investment vault and therefore team should consider implementing the recent EIP-4626 standard, as it could enable a lot of potential integrations and would avoid having to deploy wrappers...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/03/02 12:00 a.m.14 views

Lack of exception handling

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After looking through the following functions: NFTMarketOffer.sol::264 - IERC721nftContract.transferFrommsg.sender, offer.buyer, tokenId NFTMarketPrivateSale.sol::177 - nftContract.transferFromseller, msg.sender, tokenId; We were able to reach the...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/03/02 12:00 a.m.17 views

[WP-M6] Inappropriate support of EIP-2981

Lines of code Vulnerability details if nftContract.supportsERC165InterfacetypeIRoyaltyInfo.interfaceId try IRoyaltyInfonftContract.royaltyInfo gas: READONLYGASLIMIT tokenId, BASISPOINTS returns address receiver, uint256 / royaltyAmount / if receiver != address0 recipients = new address payable;...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/03/02 12:00 a.m.27 views

EIP-712 signatures can be re-used in private sales

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Within a NFTMarketPrivateSale contract, buyers are allowed to purchase a seller's NFT. This is done through a seller providing a buyer a EIP-712 signature. The buyer can then call buyFromPrivateSaleFor providing the v, r, and s values of the signature as...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/02/23 12:00 a.m.15 views

TurboSafe - should override maxWithdraw and maxRedeem

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Considering the EIP , as withdraw must revert if it is not possible to withdraw assets , it is important to have an accurate maxWithdraw function. However, here, maxWithdraw does not account for the current max withdrawal in the cToken contract. Liquidit...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/02/23 12:00 a.m.12 views

IERC4626RouterBase - withdraw - slippage does not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The router does not have the intended behavior: according to the EIP , withdraw burn shares to withdraw exactly assets, so the slippage protection should protect the user from burning too many shares. Furthermore, comments in the interface are incorrect ...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Packet Storm
Packet Storm
added 2022/02/17 12:00 a.m.288 views

Backdoor.Win32.Zombam.b Buffer Overflow

Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com c 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/1e3665a67201209609ae493a2a590bee.txt Contact: [email protected] Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Zombam.b Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: z0mbie's HTTP RAT...

0.9AI score
SaveExploits0
NVD
NVD
added 2022/02/04 2:15 a.m.35 views

CVE-2021-45736

TOTOLINK X5000R v9.1.0u.6118B20201102 was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the function setL2tpServerCfg. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service DoS via the eip, sip, server parameters...

7.8CVSS0.01175EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Prion
Prion
added 2022/02/04 2:15 a.m.26 views

Stack overflow

TOTOLINK X5000R v9.1.0u.6118B20201102 was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the function setL2tpServerCfg. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service DoS via the eip, sip, server parameters...

7.8CVSS7.6AI score0.01175EPSS
SaveExploits1References1Affected Software1
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
added 2022/02/04 12:00 a.m.12 views

PT-2022-12378 · Totolink · Totolink X5000R

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: TOTOLINK X5000R version 9.1.0u.6118 B20201102 Description: A stack overflow was discovered in the setL2tpServerCfg function, allowing attackers to cause a Denial of Service DoS via the eip, sip, server parameters. Recommendations: For TOTOLIN...

7.8CVSS7.5AI score0.01175EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
Packet Storm
Packet Storm
added 2022/01/03 12:00 a.m.230 views

Backdoor.Win32.Jokerdoor Buffer Overflow

Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com c 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/0fca0250fa3fe8ee7e1cf0cc45a6b2d8.txt Contact: [email protected] Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Jokerdoor Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: The malware listen...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Packet Storm
Packet Storm
added 2021/12/13 12:00 a.m.121 views

Backdoor.Win32.Ncx.b Buffer Overflow

Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com c 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/991c1f02c809cee860cb712896a45338B.txt Contact: [email protected] Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Ncx.b Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: The malware listens o...

0.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Packet Storm
Packet Storm
added 2021/11/05 12:00 a.m.537 views

Backdoor.Win32.Ncx.b Buffer Overflow

Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com c 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/885e74a43b4f7caec3cfb4dba0787de4.txt Contact: [email protected] Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Ncx.b Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: The malware listens on...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
zdt
zdt
added 2021/08/18 12:00 a.m.169 views

crossfire-server 1.9.0 - SetUp() Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit

Exploit Title: crossfire-server 1.9.0 - 'SetUp' Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit Author: Khaled Salem @Khaled0x07 Software Link: https://www.exploit-db.com/apps/43240af83a4414d2dcc19fff3af31a63-crossfire-1.9.0.tar.gz Version: 1.9.0 Tested on: Kali Linux 2020.4 CVE : CVE-2006-1236 !/bin/python impor...

7.5CVSS0.3AI score0.27975EPSS
SaveExploits5
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2021/08/14 12:00 a.m.24 views

Use safeTransfer instead of transfer

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact Tokens not compliant with the ERC20 specification could return false from the transfer function call to indicate the transfer fails, while the calling contract would not notice the failure if the return value is not checked. Checking the return value is a...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder