CVE-2026-69125

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67321. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67321. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67321 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-69124

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67320. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67320. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67320 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-69123

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67319. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67319. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67319 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68948

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67318. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67318. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67318 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68947

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67317. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67317. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67317 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68946

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67315. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67315. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67315 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68944

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67316. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67316. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67316 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68943

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67314. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67314. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67314 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68942

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67313. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67313. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67313 instead of this candidate...

CVE-2026-68941

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67312. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67312. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67312 instead of this candidate...

GHSA-6HR6-W5QG-QMWG h2: Duplicate Host header could facilitate request smuggling

Impact h2 =4.4.0 accepts request header blocks containing more than one Host header, and forwards every Host header to the consuming application. Where the consumer downgrades HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1, the resulting request carries two Host header lines, which is a request smuggling primitive CWE-444...

h2: Duplicate Host header could facilitate request smuggling

Impact h2 =4.4.0 accepts request header blocks containing more than one Host header, and forwards every Host header to the consuming application. Where the consumer downgrades HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1, the resulting request carries two Host header lines, which is a request smuggling primitive CWE-444...

CVE-2026-71554 h2: Duplicate Host header could facilitate request smuggling

h2 is a pure-Python implementation of a HTTP/2 protocol stack. Versions up to and including 4.4.0 accept request header blocks containing more than one Host header, and forward every Host header to the consuming application. Where the consumer downgrades HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1, the resulting request...

CVE-2026-71554

CVE-2026-71554 affects the Python HTTP/2 stack in the h2 package. Versions up to and including 4.4.0 accept header blocks containing more than one Host header and forward all Host headers to the application. When a client downgrades HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1, this can yield two Host header lines, enabli...

CVE-2026-71554 h2: Duplicate Host header could facilitate request smuggling

h2 is a pure-Python implementation of a HTTP/2 protocol stack. Versions up to and including 4.4.0 accept request header blocks containing more than one Host header, and forward every Host header to the consuming application. Where the consumer downgrades HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1, the resulting request...

league/commonmark: Denial of service via duplicate footnote definitions

Impact The Footnote extension records one backref per footnote reference and then appends the entire backref list for every footnote definition block in the document, without ever de-duplicating or removing repeated definitions of the same label GatherFootnotesListener, populated by...

GHSA-JFM3-95JQ-Q3RF league/commonmark: Denial of service via duplicate footnote definitions

Impact The Footnote extension records one backref per footnote reference and then appends the entire backref list for every footnote definition block in the document, without ever de-duplicating or removing repeated definitions of the same label GatherFootnotesListener, populated by...

CVE-2026-64603

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86: intel-hid: Protect ACPI notify handler against recursion Since commit e2ffcda16290 "ACPI: OSL: Allow Notify handlers to run on all CPUs" ACPI notify handlers like the intel-hid notifyhandler may run on multiple CPU...

CVE-2025-11850

When secondary user stores are configured, the implicit-association resolver incorrectly initializes from a secondary user store and bypasses the primary user store during search and uniqueness checks. This allows a subject to be associated with an unintended local account if the same lookup clai...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64603

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86: intel-hid: Protect ACPI notify handler against recursion Since commit e2ffcda16290 "ACPI: OSL: Allow Notify handlers to run on all CPUs" ACPI notify handlers like the intel-hid notifyhandler may run on multiple CPU...