5520 matches found
CVE-2017-9411
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9100. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9100. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9100 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2017-9410
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9101. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9101. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9101 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4234. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4234. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4234 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2010-4244
CVE-2010-4244 is rejected/not used; this entry does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2011-4935
CVE-2011-4935 is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-0821. Connected records show the concrete issue: Joomla! 1.6.x and 1.7.x before 1.7.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors (unspecified vulnerability). This entry is linked to CVE-2012-0821, which document...
CVE-2011-4933
CVE-2011-4933 is rejected; use CVE-2012-0819 instead.
CVE-2011-3608
CVE-2011-3608 is a rejection; this CVE entry is not used.
CVE-2011-4936
CVE-2011-4936 is rejected/not used; refer to CVE-2012-0822.
UBUNTU-CVE-2017-11545
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11543. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-11543. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11543 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
UBUNTU-CVE-2017-11544
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11543. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-11543. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11543 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2017-11545
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11543. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-11543. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11543 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2017-11544
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11543. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-11543. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11543 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2017-11544
CVE-2017-11544 is rejected/not used; refer to CVE-2017-11543 instead.
CVE-2017-11545
CVE-2017-11545 is a duplicate of CVE-2017-11543 (do not use this candidate). The connected advisories confirm concrete details for tcpdump pre-4.9.2: CVE-2017-11543 is an out-of-bounds write in tcpdump’s Slip handling (print-sl.c, sliplink_print) that could crash the application and potentially a...
CVE-2012-2323
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-2214. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-2214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-2214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2012-2382
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1930. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-1930. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1930 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2012-2382
CVE-2012-2382 entry is rejected/not used; references CVE-2011-1930 instead.
CVE-2012-3550
CVE-2012-3550 is a rejected candidate; reference CVE-2012-3467 instead; this entry is not an active vulnerability.