6316 matches found
CVE-2016-0719
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0718. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0718. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0718 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2016-0719
CVE-2016-0718 is an out-of-bounds read flaw in the Expat XML parser. Connected advisories note a remote attacker could cause a crash or, in some cases, arbitrary code execution by supplying crafted XML to an application using Expat. Public entries reference affected packages as Expat (with Red Ha...
CVE-2016-2189
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4565. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4565. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4565 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4565. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4565. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4565 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
SUSE-SU-2016:1291-1 Security update for ntp
This update for ntp to 4.2.8p7 fixes the following issues: CVE-2016-1547, bsc977459: Validate crypto-NAKs, AKA: CRYPTO-NAK DoS. CVE-2016-1548, bsc977461: Interleave-pivot CVE-2016-1549, bsc977451: Sybil vulnerability: ephemeral association attack. CVE-2016-1550, bsc977464: Improve NTP security...
CVE-2016-2447
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2016-2438
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-2547, CVE-2016-2548. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-2547 and CVE-2016-2548. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-2547 and/or CVE-2016-2548 instead of this candidate. All references and description...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2016-2447
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-2547, CVE-2016-2548. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-2547 and CVE-2016-2548. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-2547 and/or CVE-2016-2548 instead of this candidate. All references and description...
CVE-2016-2447
CVE-2016-2447 is a reserved/duplicate entry that has been superseded by CVE-2016-4477; the descriptions in this candidate were removed to prevent usage. For concrete details and impact, refer to CVE-2016-4477, which describes that wpa_supplicant 0.4.0 through 2.5 does not reject newline/CR in pas...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8496. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8496. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8496 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2014-8486
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8496. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8496. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8496 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2015-3571
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-3571. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3571. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-3571 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2015-3569
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-3569. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3569. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-3569 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2015-3572
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-3572. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3572. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-3572 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2015-3569
CVE-2015-3569 is rejected/not used; this ID does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
CVE-2015-3571
CVE-2015-3571 is rejected/not used; this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3571.
CVE-2015-4829
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0638. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0638. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0638 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...