5439 matches found
CVE-2010-2077
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1640. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1640. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1640 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1640. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1640. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1640 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2010-2077
The CVE-2010-2077 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1455. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1455. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1455 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2010-1456
CVE-2010-1456 is rejected; reference CVE-2010-1455 instead.
CVE-2010-1974
CVE-2010-1974 is rejected/not used; reference CVE-2010-1168 instead.
CVE-2010-1738
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1448. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1448. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1448 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2010-1745
CVE-2010-1745 is rejected/not used; this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1867.
CVE-2010-1738
CVE-2010-1738 is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
CVE-2010-1501
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1767. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1767. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1767 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1767. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1767. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1767 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2010-1501
CVE-2010-1501 entry is rejected and not used; reference CVE-2010-1767 instead.
Code injection
The PayPal Website Payments Standard functionality in the Ubercart module 5.x before 5.x-1.9 and 6.x before 6.x-2.1 for Drupal does not properly validate orders, which allows remote attackers to trigger unspecified "duplicate actions" via unknown vectors...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1564. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1564. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1564 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
CVE-2010-1564
CVE-2010-1564 is rejected/not used; this entry is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1564.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1241. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1241 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2010-0200
CVE-2010-0200 is rejected/not used; a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241.
Signing in with username with different case creates new user
We currently utilize LDAP for our user repository and allow users to be automatically added to crucible if they can successfully authenticate. We have recently received complaints from users that their names were showing up two times in reviews. After some analysis we saw that there were 2...
Signing in with username with different case creates new user
We currently utilize LDAP for our user repository and allow users to be automatically added to crucible if they can successfully authenticate. We have recently received complaints from users that their names were showing up two times in reviews. After some analysis we saw that there were 2...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...