SUSE CVE-2012-5979

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-5079. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-5079. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-5079 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been...

SUSE CVE-2012-6056

Integer overflow in the dissectsackchunk function in epan/dissectors/packet-sctp.c in the SCTP dissector in Wireshark 1.8.x before 1.8.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service infinite loop via a crafted Duplicate TSN count...

SUSE CVE-2012-6686

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4357. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-4357. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4357 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2013-0279

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

SUSE CVE-2013-0278

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

SUSE CVE-2013-0280

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

SUSE CVE-2013-0334

Bundler before 1.7, when multiple top-level source lines are used, allows remote attackers to install arbitrary gems by creating a gem with the same name as another gem in a different source...

SUSE CVE-2013-1873

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2634, CVE-2013-2635, CVE-2013-2636. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2634, CVE-2013-2635, and CVE-2013-2636. Notes: All CVE users should reference one or more of CVE-2013-2634, CVE-2013-2635, and CVE-2013-2636 instead of this...

SUSE CVE-2013-1894

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2561. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2561. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2561 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2013-2026

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4971. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-4971. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4971 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2013-2206

The sctpsfdo524dupcook function in net/sctp/smstatefuns.c in the SCTP implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.8.5 does not properly handle associations during the processing of a duplicate COOKIE ECHO chunk, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service NULL pointer dereference a...

SUSE CVE-2013-6379

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4513. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-4513. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4513 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2013-6405

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, CVE-2013-7281. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, and CVE-2013-7281. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265,...

SUSE CVE-2013-6406

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-6858. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-6858. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-6858 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2013-6463

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-7266, CVE-2013-7267, CVE-2013-7268, CVE-2013-7269, CVE-2013-7270, CVE-2013-7271. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-7266, CVE-2013-7267, CVE-2013-7268, CVE-2013-7269, CVE-2013-7270, and CVE-2013-7271. Notes: All CVE users shoul...

SUSE CVE-2013-6488

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-0328. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-0328. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-0328 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2013-6629

The getsos function in jdmarker.c in 1 libjpeg 6b and 2 libjpeg-turbo through 1.3.0, as used in Google Chrome before 31.0.1650.48, Ghostscript, and other products, does not check for certain duplications of component data during the reading of segments that follow Start Of Scan SOS JPEG markers,...

SUSE CVE-2014-0235

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0325, CVE-2014-3538. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-0325 and/or CVE-2014-3538. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0325 instead of this candidate for the issue in the Intern...

SUSE CVE-2014-1448

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-1447. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-1447. Only one candidate was needed for the disclosure in question. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-1447 instead of this candidate. All references and...

SUSE CVE-2014-3540

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-0114. CVE abstraction content decisions did not require a second ID. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in thi...