SUSE CVE-2004-2770

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-3389. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-3389. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-3389 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2005-0528

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0985. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0985. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0985 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2005-1277

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-1766. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-1766. Notes: This duplicate occurred due to insufficient coordination across three separate parties. All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-1766 instead of this candidate. All reference...

SUSE CVE-2005-3597

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3573. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3573. A CNA error by MITRE introduced the duplicate. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3573 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have...

SUSE CVE-2005-3990

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-3619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3619 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2006-1054

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2006-1663

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0996. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-0996. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0996 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2006-2493

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2006-2657

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2006-3466

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3600. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3600. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3600 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...

SUSE CVE-2006-4341

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4340. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. It is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-4340. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4340 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been...

SUSE CVE-2006-4924

sshd in OpenSSH before 4.4, when using the version 1 SSH protocol, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service CPU consumption via an SSH packet that contains duplicate blocks, which is not properly handled by the CRC compensation attack detector...

SUSE CVE-2006-5470

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5740. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5740 due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5740 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accident...

SUSE CVE-2006-5941

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2177. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2177. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2177 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2007-0234

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0243. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0243. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0243 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2007-1323

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2893. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but some sources used this identifier for a separate issue, and a duplicate identifier had also been created by the time dual use was detected. Notes: All CVE users should consult...

SUSE CVE-2007-2653

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2438 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2007-3004

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2007-3005

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2789. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2789. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2789 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...

SUSE CVE-2007-3947

request.c in lighttpd 1.4.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service daemon crash by sending an HTTP request with duplicate headers, as demonstrated by a request containing two Location header lines, which results in a segmentation fault...