174 matches found
CVE-2016-2859
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0834. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0834. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0834 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2015-2303
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6406. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6406. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6406 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0728. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0728. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0728 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2354. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-2354. The wrong ID was used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2354 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8518. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8518. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8518 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2014-4740
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-4907, CVE-2014-4908. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-4907 and CVE-2014-4908. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-4907 and/or CVE-2014-4908 instead of this candidate. All references and description...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-5965. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-5965. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-5965 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-5795. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-5795. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-5795 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-6345. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-6345. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-6345 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2013-6405
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, CVE-2013-7281. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, and CVE-2013-7281. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264,...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4513. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-4513. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4513 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2013-1894
CVE-2013-1894 is rejected/not used; refer to CVE-2013-2561 as the active entry.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2218. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-2218. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2218 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2013-0279
CVE-2013-0279 is a duplicate and is rejected/not used; refer to CVE-2013-1664/1665.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2615. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2615. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2615 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2013-1825
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2546, CVE-2013-2547, CVE-2013-2548. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2546, CVE-2013-2547, and CVE-2013-2548. Notes: All CVE users should reference one or more of CVE-2013-2546, CVE-2013-2547, and CVE-2013-254...
CVE-2012-5979
CVE-2012-5979 is rejected and not used as an active vulnerability entry.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4669. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4669. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4669 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2012-0026
CVE-2012-0026 is a duplicate of CVE-2012-0287. The connected records describe a WordPress 3.3.x XSS vulnerability (pre-3.3.1) that can be triggered by a crafted request, allowing arbitrary script execution in a user’s browser. Affected product: WordPress 3.3.x prior to 3.3.1. Root cause : cross-s...
CVE-2004-2770
CVE-2004-2770 is a duplicate of CVE-2011-3389. The connected documents describe CVE-2011-3389, a vulnerability in SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 CBC-mode handling that can allow an attacker to recover portions of plaintext. Reports and advisories show mitigations and fixes across vendors: Mitigation: in som...