CVE-2025-12889 TLS 1.2 Client Can Downgrade Digest Used

With TLS 1.2 connections a client can use any digest, specifically a weaker digest that is supported, rather than those in the CertificateRequest...

CVE-2025-11934 Improper Validation of Signature Algorithm Used in TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify

Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously...

CVE-2025-11934 Improper Validation of Signature Algorithm Used in TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify

Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously...

CVE-2025-11934

CVE-2025-11934 concerns wolfSSL’s TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation that can downgrade the negotiated signature algorithm (e.g., client supports ECDSA P521 but server accepts and uses ECDSA P256), potentially weakenin...

CVE-2025-11934

Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously...

CVE-2025-11934 Improper Validation of Signature Algorithm Used in TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify

Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously...

CVE-2025-11934

Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously...

Beyond Jailbreak: Unveiling Risks in LLM Applications Arising from Blurred Capability Boundaries

LLM applications i.e., LLM apps leverage the powerful capabilities of LLMs to provide users with customized services, revolutionizing traditional application development. While the increasing prevalence of LLM-powered applications provides users with unprecedented convenience, it also brings fort...

wolfssl -- multiple issues

wolfSSL blog reports: This release includes multiple fixes across TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3, X25519, XChaCha20-Poly1305, and PSK processing. Highlights include: A timing-side-channel issue in X25519 specifically affecting Xtensa-based ESP32 devices. Low-memory X25519 implementations are now the default fo...

CVE-2025-64429

DuckDB is a SQL database management system. DuckDB implemented block-based encryption of DB on the filesystem starting with DuckDB 1.4.0. There are a few issues related to this implementation. The DuckDB can fall back to an insecure random number generator pcg32 to generate cryptographic keys or...

PYSEC-2025-112

DuckDB is a SQL database management system. DuckDB implemented block-based encryption of DB on the filesystem starting with DuckDB 1.4.0. There are a few issues related to this implementation. The DuckDB can fall back to an insecure random number generator pcg32 to generate cryptographic keys or...

PYSEC-2025-112

DuckDB is a SQL database management system. DuckDB implemented block-based encryption of DB on the filesystem starting with DuckDB 1.4.0. There are a few issues related to this implementation. The DuckDB can fall back to an insecure random number generator pcg32 to generate cryptographic keys or...

CVE-2025-64429 DuckDB Encryption Crypto implementation is vulnerable

DuckDB is a SQL database management system. DuckDB implemented block-based encryption of DB on the filesystem starting with DuckDB 1.4.0. There are a few issues related to this implementation. The DuckDB can fall back to an insecure random number generator pcg32 to generate cryptographic keys or...

CVE-2025-64429

DuckDB 1.4.0–pre-1.4.2 encryption implementation is vulnerable due to multiple cryptographic weaknesses: insecure RNG (pcg32 fallback), possible memory wipe omission (memset) leaving secrets, and header manipulation could downgrade from GCM to CTR, bypassing integrity. There may also be unhandled...

PT-2025-46723

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions DuckDB versions 1.4.0 through 1.4.1 Description DuckDB, a SQL database management system, contains issues related to its block-based encryption implementation introduced in version 1.4.0. The system can fall back to an insecure random number...

EulerOS 2.0 SP10 : curl (EulerOS-SA-2025-2382)

According to the versions of the curl packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities : 1. A cookie is set using the secure keyword for https://target 2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with http://target same hostname,...

CVE-2025-63384

A vulnerability was discovered in RISC-V Rocket-Chip v1.6 and before implementation where the SRET Supervisor-mode Exception Return instruction fails to correctly transition the processor's privilege level. Instead of downgrading from Machine-mode M-mode to Supervisor-mode S-mode as specified by...

CVE-2025-63384

A vulnerability was discovered in RISC-V Rocket-Chip v1.6 and before implementation where the SRET Supervisor-mode Exception Return instruction fails to correctly transition the processor's privilege level. Instead of downgrading from Machine-mode M-mode to Supervisor-mode S-mode as specified by...

Lexmark Printers Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (CVE-2023-50738)

A new feature to prevent Firmware downgrades was recently added to some Lexmark products. A method to override this downgrade protection has been identified. Lexmark documentation recommends that access to the Firmware Updates be restricted to trusted personnel. %NASLMINLEVEL 80900 C Tenable, Inc...

CVE-2025-43468

A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.2, macOS Sonoma 14.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.1. An app may be able to access sensitive user data...