Lucene search
K

5 matches found

RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2026/01/09 10:34 a.m.8 views

CVE-2017-18868

Digi XBee 2 devices do not have an effective protection mechanism against remote AT commands, because of issues related to the network stack upon which the ZigBee protocol is built...

7.7CVSS7.2AI score0.00791EPSS
Exploits0References1
NVD
NVD
added 2020/05/21 8:15 p.m.22 views

CVE-2017-18868

Digi XBee 2 devices do not have an effective protection mechanism against remote AT commands, because of issues related to the network stack upon which the ZigBee protocol is built...

7.7CVSS7.7AI score0.00791EPSS
Exploits0References1
Prion
Prion
added 2020/05/21 8:15 p.m.22 views

Input validation

Digi XBee 2 devices do not have an effective protection mechanism against remote AT commands, because of issues related to the network stack upon which the ZigBee protocol is built...

5.5CVSS7.6AI score0.00791EPSS
Exploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2020/05/21 7:13 p.m.21 views

CVE-2017-18868

Digi XBee 2 devices do not have an effective protection mechanism against remote AT commands, because of issues related to the network stack upon which the ZigBee protocol is built...

7.7AI score0.00791EPSS
Exploits0References1
CVE
CVE
added 2020/05/21 7:13 p.m.45 views

CVE-2017-18868

CVE-2017-18868 relates to Digi XBee 2 devices, where the network stack underpinning ZigBee enables an attacker to issue remote AT commands due to an ineffective protection mechanism. The vulnerability can impact integrity and availability (I: Partial, A: Partial) with no confidentiality impact de...

7.7CVSS7.6AI score0.00791EPSS
Exploits0References1Affected Software1
Rows per page
Query Builder