CVE-2025-4037

CVE-2025-4037 affects Code-Projects ATM Banking 1.0. The issue is a logic error in the moneyDeposit/moneyWithdraw functions, allowing local access to exploit and causing business logic errors. Exploitation has been disclosed publicly. No official patch details are provided in the documents. A pra...

I spoke to a task scammer. Here’s how it went

Tasks scam are surging, with a year over year increase of 400%. So I guess it should have been no surprise when I was contacted by a task scammer on X recently. Task scammers prey on people looking for remote jobs by offering them simple repetitive tasks such as liking videos, optimizing apps,...

CVE-2020-2945

Vulnerability in the Oracle Financial Services Deposit Insurance Calculations for Liquidity Risk Management product of Oracle Financial Services Applications component: User Interfaces. Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.7 and 8.0.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privilege...

CVE-2024-37159 Evmos is missing create validator check

Evmos is the Ethereum Virtual Machine EVM Hub on the Cosmos Network. This vulnerability allowed a user to create a validator using vested tokens to deposit the self-bond. This vulnerability is fixed in 18.0.0...

CVE-2024-4307 SQL injection vulnerability in HubBank

SQL injection vulnerability in HubBank affecting version 1.0.2. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to send a specially crafted SQL query to the database through different endpoints /accounts/activities.php?id=1, /accounts/view-deposit.php?id=1, /accounts/viewcards. php?id=1,...

CVE-2024-4307 SQL injection vulnerability in HubBank

SQL injection vulnerability in HubBank affecting version 1.0.2. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to send a specially crafted SQL query to the database through different endpoints /accounts/activities.php?id=1, /accounts/view-deposit.php?id=1, /accounts/viewcards. php?id=1,...

LP rewards in liquidity_lockbox can be arbitraged

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The liquiditylockbox contract is designed to handle liquidity positions in a specific Orca LP pool. Users can deposit their LP NFTs into the contract, receiving in exchange tokens according to their position size. These tokens are minted with the goal of...

Depository.sol#L291 : Lack of slippage protection when deposit tokens in exchange for a bond from a specified product

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of slippage protection for an user from minting the OLAs for the given token amount. When the price fluctuation is high, user would suffer with huge loss. Proof of Concept Depository contract would be used to create a product and for a particular...

Griefing attack on liquidity_lockbox withdrawals due to lack of minimum deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The liquiditylockbox contract does not enforce a minimum deposit limit. This allows a user to open many positions with minimum liquidity, forcing other users to close these positions one by one in order to withdraw. This could lead to a griefing attack...

veOLAS.sol : PointVoting's slope and bias values are reset to zero when depositing for another account.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the bias vote weight and slope are reset, the voting power of as user is nullified. Proof of Concept veOLAS.sol is escrow based contract where the OLAs tokens are locked for certain amount of time in order to gain the voting power. This voting powe...

Attacker can cause deposits to be locked in the Solana lockbox

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can cause deposits to be locked in the lockbox Proof of Concept In withdraw, if the position has 0 liquidity the execution is reverted function withdrawuint64 amount external address positionAddress =...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #776 [1701456793936]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 776 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Low-01 No minimum AmountrsETH receive parameter absent in depositAsset Here we can see that User deposit asset via depositAsset which take asset address and asset depositAmount as parameter Then rsethAmountMinted...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #776 [1701452999417]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 776 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Low-01 No minimum AmountrsETH receive parameter absent in depositAsset Here we can see that User deposit asset via depositAsset which take asset address and asset depositAmount as parameter Then rsethAmountMinted...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #776 [1701285150754]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 776 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Low-01 No minimum AmountrsETH receive parameter absent in depositAsset Here we can see that User deposit asset via depositAsset which take asset address and asset depositAmount as parameter Then rsethAmountMinted...

Attacker can Grief The Call to depositAsset Making It Impossible For The Victim To Deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The attacker can grief the victim , making him unable to deposit asset into the pool. Proof of Concept The attack flow is as follows - Alice decides to deposit assets into the LRTDepositPool.sol , she calls depositPool here At L152 the function makes the...

Max deposit limit on assets per deposit on strategy on EigenLayer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Each strategy on EigenLayer has a maxPerDeposit it validates all individual deposits into the concerned strategy against. This is inclusive of the maxTotalDeposits against a strategy. These two upper limits are validated against deposits to the strategy,...

Too small deposits will result in no rsEth mint for the

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User will get nothing if the deposit amount is too small . Proof of Concept The getRsETHAmountToMint is for getting the conversion rate of asset to rsEth . /// @return rsethAmountToMint Amount of rseth to mint function getRsETHAmountToMint address asset,...

Biased rsETH price calculation in depositAsset results in lesser rsETH minted to user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The LRTDepositPool acts as a simplified vault allowing restakers to transfer their liquid staked tokens and receive rsETH tokens based on the current rsETH exchange rate. rsETH are minted to user by interacting with depositAsset function of LRTDepositPoo...

Mint amount calculation in deposit is incorrect

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The calculation in the deposit function of the DepositPool contract is flawed as it factors the deposited amount into the RSETH price to calculate the amount to mint. Impact When a user deposits in the DepositPool contract, the amount of RSETH to mint i...

No slippage control on deposit of LRTDepositPool.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no slippage control on depositAsset of LRTDepositPool, which expose user to sandwich attack. Proof of Concept Any deposit can be sandwiched in LRTDepositPool, especially when the pool is not balanced. Exploit Scenario: Bob, a normal user, calls...