Cross site scripting

ChurchCRM Version 4.4.5 has XSS vulnerabilities that allow attackers to store XSS via location input Deposit Comment...

CVE-2022-36136

ChurchCRM Version 4.4.5 has XSS vulnerabilities that allow attackers to store XSS via location input Deposit Comment...

ChurchCRM 跨站脚本漏洞

ChurchCRM is an open source CRM system for churches. A security vulnerability exists in ChurchCRM version 4.4.5 that stems from the presence of XSS, allowing an attacker to store XSS via Deposit Comment input...

CVE-2022-36136

ChurchCRM Version 4.4.5 has XSS vulnerabilities that allow attackers to store XSS via location input Deposit Comment...

PT-2022-23218 · Churchcrm · Churchcrm

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: ChurchCRM version 4.4.5 Description: The issue allows attackers to store XSS via location input Deposit Comment. This enables potential malicious activities through the exploitation of this input field. Recommendations: For ChurchCRM version...

user fund lose in deposit() of PirexERC4626 contract because A MALICIOUS EARLY USER/ATTACKER CAN MANIPULATE THE VAULT’S PRICEPERSHARE TO TAKE AN UNFAIR SHARE OF FUTURE USERS’ DEPOSITS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This is a well-known attack vector for new contracts that utilize pricePerShare for accounting. Attacker can cause totalAssets / totalSupply ratio to go as high as he wants and then because of rounding error in convertToShares lower amount of share would...

Deposit can be front-runned

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The depositor who got frontrun by the attacker will lose all their funds. And all the future depositors. An attacker can front run the first user's deposit and transfer tokens to the vault directly causing all future depositors to lose all their funds...

First depositer can break Vault share distributions

Lines of code Vulnerability details The calculation of exchange rate for shares in PirexERC4626 Vault is done by dividing the total supply of shares by the totalAssets of the vault. The first depositor can mint a very small number of shares, then donate to the vault to manipulate the share price...

Steal deposit fund in ERC4626 vault by exchange rate manipulation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Although the PirexERC4626 and AutoPxGlp contract check for 0 shares, the rounding down error can still be used to steal new user deposit. Part of the new deposit could be stolen. The attacker may monitor the pool activities to catch the steal...

Slashing can prevent Protected Staking Pool depositors from redeeming their ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details The documentation states that: The Protected Staking Pool is free from any slashing and leaking risk. While the penalties affect the node operator first, then the Fees and MEV Pool stakers, if the slashing amount is higher, it will also impact the Protected...

Medium: Giant pools are prone to user griefing, preventing their holdings from being staked.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description batchRotateLPTokens in GiantMevAndFeesPool allows any user to rotate LP tokens of stakingFundsVaults around. function batchRotateLPTokens address calldata stakingFundsVaults, LPToken calldata oldLPTokens, LPToken calldata newLPTokens, uint256 callda...

Medium: Vaults can be griefed to not be able to be used for deposits

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description Interaction with SavETHVault and StakingFundsVault require a minimum amount of MINSTAKINGAMOUNT. In order to be used for staking, there needs to be 24 ETH or 4 ETH for the desired BLS public key in those vaults. The issue is that vaults can be grief...

SLOT owners lose half their value when there is no sETH deposited to the Syndicate.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The Syndicate contract uses total balance as collateral for both sETH accumulatedETHPerFreeFloatingShare and SLOT rewards accumulatedETHPerCollateralizedSlotPerKnot. They are updated in the following function: function updateAccruedETHPerShares publ...

deposit and withdraw emit the same event than mint and burn in ERC20 and can affect to Dapps

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deposit and Withdraw emit the same event than burn and mint than ERC20 so it's not possible to distinguish in a DAPP than deposit and withdraw are not mint or burn and could affect to the DAPP logics. For example, cointracking.info could understand in a...

Borrower can close non-existent credit line positions to effectively force the overall status to REPAID

Lines of code Vulnerability details The LineOfCredit.close function is used to close a credit line position. Both the lender of a specific credit position and the borrower can call this function. However, the function does not check if the given id belongs to a credit line position in the credits...

Arbitrary call order to handle mutual consent can lead to unrecoverable native ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Creating new credits and increasing the credit deposit requires both parties, the lender and the borrower, to agree. This is implemented by having both call the same function with the same call data. However, as it's possible to use native ETH as a credit token...

No Allowlist For Bridgeable ERC-20 Tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details We noticed that the deposit function of the L1ERC20Bridge contract code snippet 1 permits a user to bridge any ERC-20 tokens including deflationary and rebase tokens from the L1 to the L2 network. We considered that permitting non-standard...

L2 deposits might be reverted

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact L1ERC20Bridge and L1EthBridge contracts have claimFailedDeposit function to withdraw funds from the initiated deposit, which failed when finalizing on L2. However, if the caller is allowed in senderCanCallFunction modifier, this function can be used to...

Optimistic bridging pattern, can lead to bridge exploitation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Zero deposit Bridging. Wherease users can fake the depositing process but can mint multiple tokens in the destination chain. The bridging is optimistic, whereas the validation restricts to just checking the function selector and a no-error pattern, this...

Frontrunning the initialize function can drain the LP initial deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can frontrun the initialize function in AlgebraPool.sol to set an unexpected price and can cause loss of funds for the initial LP deposit. Proof of Concept function initializeuint160 initialPrice external override requireglobalState.price == ...