ODProxy is flawed due to delegatecall to ODSafeManager which render system inoperable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The vulnerability arises from the use of delegatecall to interact with the ODSafeManager contract, which is designed to store the context of the safe manager. However, the data inside ODSafeManager is never properly updated when ODProxy uses delegatecall...

Unchecked return value of low level

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the code you provided earlier, there is a potential "Unchecked return value of low-level call" vulnerability in the following line: addressstrategy.delegatecallabi.encodeWithSignature"harvest"; This line of code uses the delegatecall function to invoke the...

Unchecked return value of low level call()/delegatecall()

Lines of code Vulnerability details The vulnerability related to an "Unchecked return value of low-level call/delegatecall" is a common and critical issue in Ethereum smart contracts. Let's break down this vulnerability and discuss its implications: 1. Low-Level Calls in Solidity: In Solidity,...

TEST PR 1093 - edited

Lines of code L1 Vulnerability details edited Assessed type call/delegatecall --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

CONTROLLED LOW-LEVEL CALL

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The contract was using call which was accepting address controlled by a user. This can have devastating effects on the contract as a delegate call allows the contract to execute code belonging to other contracts but using it’s own storage. This can very...

Unchecked Call Return Value

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The functions do not check the return value of low-level calls. This can lock Ether in the contract if the call fails or may compromise the contract if the ownership is being changed. The following calls were detected without return value validations -...

Controlled Delegatecall Vulnerability in Singularity, BaseUSDO, USDOLeverageModule, USDOMarketModule, and USDOOptionsModule

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Singularity, BaseUSDO, USDOLeverageModule, USDOMarketModule, and USDOOptionsModule contracts all use the delegatecall function to call a function in another contract. However, the function id of the function to be called is controlled by the caller...

The USDOMarketModule contract's lend function allows for dangerous call delegation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The USDOMarketModule contract is a module that is used by the BaseUSDO contract to facilitate functionality for market actions. The module functionality is invoked through the invocation of a delegatecall within the BaseUSDO contract's executeModule...

_sendToken in tapiocaz::Balancer::rebalance() not sending native fee will lead to revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact function sendToken address payable oft, uint256 amount, uint16 dstChainId, uint256 slippage, bytes memory data private IERC20Metadata erc20 = IERC20MetadataITapiocaOFToft.erc20; if erc20.balanceOfaddressthis amount revert ExceedsBalance; uint256 srcPoolI...

Reentrancy Vulnerability in MErc20Delegate.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The fallback function delegates calls to the implementation contract using delegatecall. This allows the implementation contract to call back into MErc20Delegate before the original delegatecall completes. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to...

tryMigrate() has onlyHub modifier but it's called from LensV2Migration

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In FollowNFT.sol, tryMigrate function has onlyHub modifier as other functions that are supposed to be called by LensHub such as follow and unfollow. These functions are called via delegatecall and LensHub is preserved as msg.sender. The problem is that t...

Using controlled delegatecall could in calling _deployTokenManager.tokenManagerDeploy()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The use of delegatecall in this context poses a security risk. When using delegatecall, the called contract's code is executed within the context of the calling contract. This means that the deployTokenManager function is executed as if it is part of the...

Using controlled delegatecall, to call InterchainTokenService._deployStandardizedToken contract instead of call()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When using delegatecall, the called contract's code is executed within the context of the calling contract. This means that the deployStandardizedToken function is executed as if it is part of the current contract, and it can potentially modify the state...

onlyProxy MODIFIER CAN BE BYPASSED BY A MALICIOUS PROXY CONTRACT AND CAN PUSH THE IMPLEMENTATION CONTRACT INTO AN UNDESIRABLE STATE

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Upgradeable.onlyProxy modifier is used to ensure that a function can only be called by the proxy and can not be directly called in the Upgradeable.sol contract. The onlyProxy modifier implementation is as follows: modifier onlyProxy // Prevent setup...

Payable functions using delegatecall inside a loop

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The use of delegatecall within a loop, in the context of a payable function, can lead to the repeated crediting of the msg.value amount, potentially causing unexpected behavior or loss of funds. Proof of Concept contract DelegatecallInLoop is Multicall...

GHSA-853P-5678-HV8F ink! vulnerable to incorrect decoding of storage value when using `DelegateCall`

Summary The return value when using delegate call mechanics, either through CallBuilder::delegate or inkenv::invokecontractdelegate, is being decoded incorrectly. Description Consider this minimal example: rust // First contract, this will be performing a delegate call to the Callee. inkstorage p...

CVE-2023-34449 ink! vulnerable to incorrect decoding of storage value when using `DelegateCall`

ink! is an embedded domain specific language to write smart contracts in Rust for blockchains built on the Substrate framework. Starting in version 4.0.0 and prior to version 4.2.1, the return value when using delegate call mechanics, either through CallBuilder::delegate or...

CVE-2023-34449 ink! vulnerable to incorrect decoding of storage value when using `DelegateCall`

ink! is an embedded domain specific language to write smart contracts in Rust for blockchains built on the Substrate framework. Starting in version 4.0.0 and prior to version 4.2.1, the return value when using delegate call mechanics, either through CallBuilder::delegate or...

User ETH will be stacked on Executor contract if the target script doesn't handle ETH.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description When user wants to execute an action, he must send ETH equal to the actionInfo.value, this ETH should be forwarded to executor.execute contract. Note: the function currently does't forward the ETH, it's explained on another issue 48, the fix is to...

Gas griefing/thief in LlamaAccount execute()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LlamaAccount execute function either delegatecall or call to the provided address. The address may contain malicious contract and should be treated as a malicious. This assumption was confirmed by implementation of this function and its comments...