7 matches found
Azure Linux 3.0 Security Update: kernel (CVE-2025-22073)
The version of kernel installed on the remote Azure Linux 3.0 host is prior to tested version. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the CVE-2025-22073 advisory. - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix a leak on spufsnewfile failur...
OESA-2025-2656 kernel security update
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fixes: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix a leak on spufsnewfile failure It's called from spufsfilldir, and caller of that will do spufsrmdir in case of failure. That does remove everything we...
CVE-2025-22073 affecting package kernel for versions less than 6.6.92.2-1
CVE-2025-22073 affecting package kernel for versions less than 6.6.92.2-1. An upgraded version of the package is available that resolves this issue...
CVE-2025-22073
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix a leak on spufsnewfile failure It's called from spufsfilldir, and caller of that will do spufsrmdir in case of failure. That does remove everything we'd managed to create, but... the problem dentry is still negative...
CVE-2025-22073
CVE-2025-22073 concerns the Linux kernel spufs subsystem. The issue is a leak in spufs_new_file() on failure during spufs_fill_dir(), where the caller proceeds to spufs_rmdir() to clean up, but the resulting dentry remains negative and must be explicitly dropped. The vulnerability is resolved in ...
CVE-2025-22073 spufs: fix a leak on spufs_new_file() failure
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix a leak on spufsnewfile failure It's called from spufsfilldir, and caller of that will do spufsrmdir in case of failure. That does remove everything we'd managed to create, but... the problem dentry is still negative...
CVE-2025-22073
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix a leak on spufsnewfile failure It's called from spufsfilldir, and caller of that will do spufsrmdir in case of failure. That does remove everything we'd managed to create, but... the problem dentry is still negative...