CVE-2020-5943

In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password...

F5 Networks BIG-IP : iControl REST vulnerability (K20059815)

The version of F5 Networks BIG-IP installed on the remote host is prior to 14.1.0.2 / 14.1.2.8 / 14.1.3 / 15.0.0. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the K20059815 advisory. - In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed...

K20059815: iControl REST vulnerability CVE-2020-5943

Security Advisory Description When a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password. CVE-2020-5943 Impact ...

CVE-2020-5943

In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password...

CVE-2020-5943

CVE-2020-5943 affects F5 BIG-IP when using the iControl REST interface. In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, protected fields are obfuscated in REST responses instead of being protected by a SecureVault cryptogram (unlike TMSH), potentially exposing sensitive data such as the GTM mo...

CVE-2020-5943

In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password...