7 matches found
CVE-2020-13768
In MiniShare before 1.4.2, there is a stack-based buffer overflow via an HTTP PUT request, which allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution, a similar issue to CVE-2018-19861, CVE-2018-19862, and CVE-2019-17601. NOTE: this product is discontinued...
Stack overflow
In MiniShare before 1.4.2, there is a stack-based buffer overflow via an HTTP PUT request, which allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution, a similar issue to CVE-2018-19861, CVE-2018-19862, and CVE-2019-17601. NOTE: this product is discontinued...
Stack overflow
In MiniShare 1.4.1, there is a stack-based buffer overflow via an HTTP CONNECT request, which allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution, a similar issue to CVE-2018-19862 and CVE-2018-19861. NOTE: this product is discontinued...
CVE-2018-19861
Affected software. MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier. Vulnerability. A stack-based or general buffer overflow in MiniShare’s HTTP handling leads to remote arbitrary code execution. For CVE-2018-19861 the overflow occurs via a long HTTP HEAD request; CVE-2019-17601 via an HTTP CONNECT request; CVE-2020-...
MiniShare 1.4.1 - 'HEAD/POST' Remote Buffer Overflow
Not only the GET method is vulnerable to BOF CVE-2004-2271. HEAD and POST methods are also vulnerable. The difference is minimal, both are exploited in the same way. Only 1 byte difference: GET = 3, HEAD and POST = 4 length ------------------------------------------------------------------- EAX...
MiniShare 1.4.1 HEAD / POST Buffer Overflow Exploit
Hi!!! playing in 2006.... I have adapted the exploit to python Not only the GET method is vulnerable to BOF CVE-2004-2271. HEAD and POST methods are also vulnerable. The difference is minimal, both are exploited in the same way. Only 1 byte difference: GET = 3, HEAD and POST = 4 length...
MiniShare 1.4.1 HEAD / POST Buffer Overflow
Hi!!! playing in 2006.... I have adapted the exploit to python Not only the GET method is vulnerable to BOF CVE-2004-2271. HEAD and POST methods are also vulnerable. The difference is minimal, both are exploited in the same way. Only 1 byte difference: GET = 3, HEAD and POST = 4 length...