Lucene search
+L

5 matches found

UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
added 2017/02/17 3:59 p.m.6 views

CVE-2016-6251

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2017/02/17 3:0 p.m.28 views

CVE-2016-6251

...

SaveExploits0
CVE
CVE
added 2017/02/17 3:0 p.m.50 views

CVE-2016-6251

CVE-2016-6251 was withdrawn (DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER); it does not represent an active vulnerability entry. Connected sources show that Mageia’s MGASA-2017-0024 documents CVE-2016-6251 alongside CVE-2016-6252, indicating shadow-utils-4.2.1 had potentially unsafe getlogin usage and an int...

7.5AI score
SaveExploits0
Mageia
Mageia
added 2017/01/27 8:30 p.m.52 views

Updated shadow-utils packages fix security vulnerabilities

It was found that shadow-utils-4.2.1 had a potentially unsafe use of getlogin with the concern that the utmp entry might have a spoofed username associated with a correct uid CVE-2016-6251. It was found that shadow-utils-4.2.1 had an incorrect integer handling problem where it looks like the int...

7.8CVSS1.7AI score0.00409EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2016/07/21 7:48 a.m.32 views

CVE-2016-6251

REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

7.6AI score
SaveExploits0References1
Rows per page
Query Builder