CVE-2026-1394

The WP Quick Contact Us plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings vi...

CVE-2026-1394

The WP Quick Contact Us plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings vi...

CVE-2026-1394 WP Quick Contact Us <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The WP Quick Contact Us plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings vi...

CVE-2025-14852

The MDirector Newsletter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.8. This is due to missing nonce verification on the mdirectorNewsletterSave function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

CVE-2025-14852 MDirector Newsletter <= 4.5.8 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update

The MDirector Newsletter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.8. This is due to missing nonce verification on the mdirectorNewsletterSave function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

CVE-2025-14873 LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events <= 5.2.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery

The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.5. This is due to the 'callbyroutename' function in the routing layer only validating user capabilities without enforcing...

Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-69634

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE:...

GitLab 18.4 < 18.4.4 / 18.5 < 18.5.2 (CVE-2025-11990)

The version of GitLab installed on the remote host is affected by a vulnerability, as follows: - GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.4 before 18.4.4, and 18.5 before 18.5.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to gain CSRF tokens by exploiting...

CVE-2026-24885

Kanboard is project management software focused on Kanban methodology. Prior to 1.2.50, a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF vulnerability exists in the ProjectPermissionController within the Kanboard application. The application fails to strictly enforce the application/json Content-Type for the...

CVE-2026-25812

PlaciPy is a placement management system designed for educational institutions. In version 1.0.0, the application enables credentialed CORS requests but does not implement any CSRF protection mechanism...

CVE-2026-25812

PlaciPy (version 1.0.0) exposes credentialed CORS and lacks CSRF protection on state-changing endpoints. The connected sources confirm this core issue but do not supply a remediation, exploit details, or vendor-specific mitigations. Practical impact: potential CSRF-style abuse where authenticated...

CVE-2026-25812 PlaciPy is Missing CSRF Protection on State-Changing Endpoints

PlaciPy is a placement management system designed for educational institutions. In version 1.0.0, the application enables credentialed CORS requests but does not implement any CSRF protection mechanism...

CVE-2025-66630

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Before 2.52.11, on Go versions prior to 1.24, the underlying crypto/rand implementation can return an error if secure randomness cannot be obtained. Because no error is returned by the Fiber v2 UUID functions, application code may...

CVE-2025-66630

Fiber is a Go web framework. Before 2.52.11 and on Go

PT-2026-7060

A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF. When a user accesses a link crafted by an attacker, the user’s account could be compromised. The affected products and versions are as follows:...

PT-2026-7122

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Fiber versions prior to 2.52.11 Fiber versions prior to 2.52.11 running on Go versions prior to 1.24 Description The Fiber framework, an Express-inspired web framework written in Go, is susceptible to generating predictable identifiers when...

CVE-2026-1082 TITLE ANIMATOR <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The TITLE ANIMATOR plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page form handler in inc/settings-page.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin...

CVE-2025-68722

Axigen Mail Server before 10.5.57 and 10.6.x before 10.6.26 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF vulnerability in the WebAdmin interface through improper handling of the s breadcrumb parameter. The application accepts state-changing requests via the GET method and automatically processes...

CVE-2020-37144

CVE-2020-37144 affects Exagate SYSGuard 6001. The root cause is a cross-site request forgery that lets an attacker trick a user into submitting a crafted HTML form to /kulyon.php, resulting in the creation of an unauthorized admin account. Affected product/version explicitly named in multiple sou...

CVE-2026-25151

Qwik is a performance focused javascript framework. Prior to version 1.19.0, Qwik City’s server-side request handler inconsistently interprets HTTP request headers, which can be abused by a remote attacker to circumvent form submission CSRF protections using specially crafted or multi-valued...