Hacker can front-run the L2 ERC20 token deployment.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact hacker can front-run the L2 ERC20 token deployment to block L2 ERC20 token finalizeDeposit Proof of Concept I intend to prove this piece of code is front-runnable by hacker: /// @notice Finalize the deposit and mint funds /// @param l1Sender The account...

LayerZeroModule miscalculates gas, risking loss of assets

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description Holograph gets it's cross chain messaging primitives through Layer Zero. To get pricing estimate, it uses the DstConfig price struct exposed in LZ's RelayerV2 The issue is that the important baseGas and gasPerByte configuration parameters, which are...

Hackers Steal $100 Million Cryptocurrency from Binance Bridge

BNB Chain, a blockchain linked to the Binance cryptocurrency exchange, disclosed an exploit on a cross-chain bridge that drained around $100 million in digital assets. "There was an exploit affecting the native cross-chain bridge between BNB Beacon Chain BEP2 and BNB Smart Chain BEP20 or BSC, kno...

_claim function vulnerable to cross-chain-replay attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details If there's a fork, since anyone can call claim, an attacker can monitor the blockchain for calls to claim, and then make the same call with the same arguments on the other chain. Proof of Concept There are no EIP-712 protections in the encoding: bytes32 leafHas...

GHSA-9J3M-G383-29QR OpenZeppelin Contracts's Cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2 see EOA calls as cross chain calls

Impact Contracts using the cross chain utilies for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts EOAs as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This is assessed as low severity because any action taken...

CVE-2022-35916

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts EOAs as cross chain calls, even though they are not...

CVE-2022-35916 Cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2 see EOA calls as cross chain calls

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts EOAs as cross chain calls, even though they are not...

CVE-2022-35916

OpenZeppelin Contracts vulnerability CVE-2022-35916 affects cross-chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, specifically CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 and LibArbitrumL2. The issue classifies direct interactions of EOAs as cross-chain calls, even when not initiated on L1, due to how cross-chain interactions ...

CVE-2022-35916 Cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2 see EOA calls as cross chain calls

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts EOAs as cross chain calls, even though they are not...

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts prior to version v4.7.2, which stems from the fact that this is a library for secure smart contract development, and that contracts using Arbitrum L2's...

PT-2022-23022 · Openzeppelin · Openzeppelin Contracts

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: OpenZeppelin Contracts versions prior to 4.7.2 Description: The issue affects contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, specifically CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2. These contracts classify direct interactions o...

arbitrary low level call

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker may perform call to an arbitrary address with controlled calldata Proof of Concept File: contracts\DepositHandler.sol: 23 if callee.code.length == 0 revert NotContract; 24: success, returnData = callee.calldata; 25 references: Tools Used vsco...

sendFundsToUser() function, where executors are fully trusted to provide the correct information to complete the cross-chain transfer

78 comment Warden: hickuphh3 One area of concern is the sendFundsToUser function, where executors are fully trusted to provide the correct information to complete the cross-chain transfer. Any executor that becomes compromised will enable the attacker to fully drain the available liquidity of a...

Cross-chain smart contract calls can revert but source chain tokens remain burnt and are not refunded

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Smart contract calls often revert. In such cases any ether sent along with the transaction is returned and sometimes the remaining gas depending on whether an assert caused the reversion or not. For contracts involving ERC20 tokens it is also expected...

[WP-M9] sendNative with CBridge will always revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details function startBridgeCBridgeData memory cBridgeData internal Storage storage s = getStorage; address bridge = bridge; // Do CBridge stuff requires.cBridgeChainId != cBridgeData.dstChainId, "Cannot bridge to the same network."; if...

Whitelist check commented out on the Cross Chain Stable tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact During the code review, It has been observed that the whitelisted token check is commented out. That will cause to user fund lost on the bridge. The related function only should allow white-listed tokens. Proof of Concept 1. Navigate to the the following...

transferredAmount on mainnet can be drained if a malicious account can mint more tokens on Schain

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone on Schain that is able to mint more tokens, other than the mint action from postMessage in tokenManagerERC20 by bridging tokens over, can potentially drain the locked tokens in transferredAmount in depositBoxERC20 on mainnet by calling exit with t...

Fee-on-transfer/rebalancing tokens are not supported

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some ERC20 tokens make modifications to their ERC20's transfer or balanceOf functions. One type of these tokens is deflationary tokens that charge a certain fee for every transfer or transferFrom. Others are rebasing tokens that increase in value over ti...

Authentication bypass by capture-replay in github.com/cosmos/ethermint

Cosmos Network Ethermint = v0.4.0 is affected by a cross-chain transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. Since ethermint uses the same chainIDEpoch and signature schemes with ethereum for compatibility, a verified signature in ethereum is still valid in ethermint with the same msg conte...

GHSA-X5F3-QMWJ-4F84 Authentication bypass by capture-replay in github.com/cosmos/ethermint

Cosmos Network Ethermint = v0.4.0 is affected by a cross-chain transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. Since ethermint uses the same chainIDEpoch and signature schemes with ethereum for compatibility, a verified signature in ethereum is still valid in ethermint with the same msg conte...