CVE-2023-34449

The CVE-2023-34449 issue affects ink! (Rust-based eDSL for Substrate). Affected versions are 4.0.0 up to, but not including, 4.2.1; the bug arises from incorrect decoding of the return value when using delegate call mechanics via CallBuilder::delegate or ink_env::invoke_contract_delegate. The roo...

expirationPeriod in the strategy contracts is not checked when calling LlamaCore.execute

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If executionPeriod is set to an extremely short time or even 0, then all actions can never be executed. Proof of Concept There are 7 states in an Action flow: Active, Canceled, Failed, Approved, Queued, Expired, Executed. Generally, the sequence goes lik...

Arbitrary delegatecalls from LlamaAccount can be used to steal assets

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Using delegatecall to call arbitrary contracts is highly dangerous as it can be used to steal assets. An attacker could sneak in a contract that steals all the assets owned by the LlamaAccount contract. Proof of Concept Below is a diff to the existing...

Problem with Day values

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. In solidity, block.timestamp makes use of seconds in calculating time but in the highlighted codes, the stated period and their comments was miscalculated. 7200 was referred to as 24 hours and was used...

pause/unpause functionnalities not implemented in many pausable contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The following contracts : SocializingPool, StaderOracle, OperatorRewardsCollector and Auction are supposed to be pausable as they all inherit from PausableUpgradeable but they don't implement the external pause/unpause functionalities which means it will...

Lack of Event Signature Verification

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The functions submitExchangeRateData, submitSDPrice, and submitValidatorStats emit events without verifying the signature of the calling contract. Malicious contracts can exploit this by emitting events with misleading information, potentially deceiving...

4337-snap (>=0.1.0 <=0.1.1), @0xabcdefg/smart-order-router (>=1.0.0 <=1.0.5) +1473 more potentially affected by CVE-2023-34234 via @openzeppelin/contracts (>=4.3.0 <=4.9.0)

@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version =4.3.0, =0.1.0, =1.0.0, =1.0.0, =3.24.7, =1.7.2, =0.107.10, =1.9.0, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =0.69.0, =0.107.0, =0.97.1, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =0.123.2 and more Source cves: CVE-2023-34234 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-5H3X-9WVQ-W4M2...

CVE-2023-34234

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the...

CVE-2023-34234 Governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning in OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the...

CVE-2023-34234 Governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning in OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the...

CVE-2023-34234

OpenZeppelin Contracts’ Governor-related vulnerability (CVE-2023-34234) allows an attacker to frontrun the creation of a proposal, enabling the attacker to become the proposer and repeatedly cancel proposals. Affected: Governor (v4.9.0) and GovernorCompatibilityBravo (since v4.3.0). Root cause: l...

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts versions prior to 4.3.0 through 4.9.1 that stems from allowing an attacker to gain the ability to cancel a proposal by creating it in advance...

5 Ways Smart Contracts Are Making A Real-World Difference

By Waqas One of the most promising innovations in the blockchain industry is the smart contract. They provide a superior… This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: 5 Ways Smart Contracts Are Making A Real-World Difference...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #42 [1684786437801]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 42 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: While the "division before multiplication" issues described in M-01 have been mitigated in the proposed changeset, there are other cases which should be addressed too. Technical Details In SafEth::stake the calculatio...

CVE-2023-32675 Nonpayable default functions are sometimes payable in vyper

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In contracts with more than one regular nonpayable function, it is possible to send funds to the default function, even if the default function is marked nonpayable. This applies to contracts compiled with vyper version...

Contracts are vulnerable to fee-on-transfer-token-related accounting issues

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Impact Without measuring the balance before and after the transfer, there's no way to ensure that enough tokens were transferred, in the cases where the token has a fee-on-transfer mechanic. If there are latent funds in the contract,...

Mitigation of M-10: Issue not mitigated

MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED Mitigation of M-10: Issue not mitigated Link to Issue: code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry-findings363 Comments Even though the protocol team applied the warden's recommendation in M-10, the feature to enable/disable derivatives added as a mitigati...

Protocol assumes a 1:1 peg of frxETH to ETH

NEW ISSUE - MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED NEW ISSUE - MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED adriro-NEW-H-01 Protocol assumes a 1:1 peg of frxETH to ETH Link to changeset: Impact The ethPerDerivative function in the SfrxEth now assumes a peg of frxETH to ETH, and reverts if the price difference queried throug...

Mitigation Confirmed for M-01

MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED Mitigation of M-01: Issue not mitigated Link to Issue: code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry-findings1078 Comments While the "division before multiplication" issues described in M-01 have been mitigated in the proposed changeset, there are other case...

Mitigation of M-02: Issue perhaps NOT sufficiently mitigated

Mitigation of M-02: Issue perhaps NOT sufficiently mitigated Mitigated issue M-02: sFrxEth may revert on redeeming non-zero amount The issue was that SfrxEth.withdrawamount may revert when called in unstake, blocking unstaking, if amount is low most realistically if amount == 1. Mitigation review...