OpenZeppelin Contracts and Contracts Upgradeable duplicated execution of subcalls in v4.9.4

Context Merge conflict resolution issue when porting the v5.0.1 Multicall update to the v4.9 branch caused a duplicated line. Impact Versions using Multicall from @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected] will execute each subcall twice. Concretely, this exposes ...

GHSA-699G-Q6QH-Q4V8 OpenZeppelin Contracts and Contracts Upgradeable duplicated execution of subcalls in v4.9.4

Context Merge conflict resolution issue when porting the v5.0.1 Multicall update to the v4.9 branch caused a duplicated line. Impact Versions using Multicall from @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected] will execute each subcall twice. Concretely, this exposes ...

Unchecked return value of low-level call()/delegatecall()

Lines of code 120, 141, 411, 184, 160, 189, 152, 444, 625, 638https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapioca-bar-audit/blob/2286f80f928f41c8bc189d0657d74ba83286c668/contract...

Fee-on-transfer/rebasing tokens will have problems when swapping

Lines of code 110 Vulnerability details Uniswap v3 does not support rebasing or fee-on-transfer tokens so using these tokens with it will result funds getting stuck. With fee-on-transfer tokens, if the balance isn't checked, the wrong amount may be transferred out. With rebasing tokens, the...

Contracts are vulnerable to fee-on-transfer accounting-related issues

Lines of code 359, 448, 509, 530, 42, 797, 162 Vulnerability details The functions below transfer funds from the caller to the receiver via transferFrom, but do not ensure that the actual number of tokens received is the same as the input amount to the transfer. If the token is a fee-on-transfer...

Malicious code in blockchain-contracts (npm)

--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: ghsa-malware a999a1b33fbea1c383e34a3e37196b2d9e96946685c3fbbff0720c1295e4bec1 Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be...

MAL-2023-8688 Malicious code in blockchain-contracts (npm)

--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: ghsa-malware a999a1b33fbea1c383e34a3e37196b2d9e96946685c3fbbff0720c1295e4bec1 Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be...

CVE-2023-49798

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

OpenZeppelin Security Vulnerability

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. OpenZeppelin Contracts suffers from a security vulnerability that stems from subjecting users to unintentional duplicate operations, such as asset transfers...

CVE-2023-49798 Duplicated execution of subcalls in OpenZeppelin Contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

CVE-2023-49798

OpenZeppelin Contracts’ CVE-2023-49798 relates to a merge-conflict error in the Multicall.sol implementation that caused all subcalls to be executed twice in versions @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected]. This duplication could lead to unintended duplicate o...

CVE-2023-49798 Duplicated execution of subcalls in OpenZeppelin Contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

Invalid WETH inclusion for Curve's Tricrypto pools.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact For some of Curve's Tricrypto pools, CurveTricryptoAdapter will not be working. Proof of Concept address wethAddress = ICurveTricryptoprimitive.coins2; zToken = calculateOceanIdaddress0x4574686572, 0; // hexadecimalascii"Ether" indexOfzToken = 2;...

Incorrect indexing in constructor of Curve Adapters causes both contracts to assume xToken and lpToken to be the same token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Curve Adapter contracts are unusable, as the protocol won't be able to tell the difference between which token USDC/USDT or lpToken is intended on being used for the transaction. Vulnerability details In the constructors of the Curve2PoolAdapter.sol and...

PT-2023-9574 · Oracle · Oracle E-Business Suite +1

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.2.5 through 12.2.13 Description: The issue is related to weaknesses in the authorization mechanism of the Authoring component in Oracle Service Contracts, part of the Oracle E-Business Suite system. This ca...

The owner is a single point of failure and a centralization risk

Lines of code 56, 109, 127, 172, 219, 250, 115, 131, 154, 116, 131https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapiocaz-audit/blob/bcf61f79464cfdc0484aa272f9f6e28d...

Contracts are vulnerable to fee-on-transfer accounting-related issues

Lines of code 359, 448, 509, 530, 42, 797, 162 Vulnerability details Impact The functions below transfer funds from the caller to the receiver via transferFrom, but do not ensure that the actual number of tokens received is the same as the input amount to the transfer. If the token is a...

Proxy's logic contract relies on code in the constructor

Lines of code 122, 50, 25, 67, 98, 67, 22 Vulnerability details Impact Logic contracts cannot rely on code in their constructors, because proxy contracts do not re-execute the logic contract's constructor - only its initializer. Move all code in the constructor to the initializer function. File:...

Reentrancy in Token Transfers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mint and burn functions perform ERC20 token transfers without implementing a reentrancy guard. This allows malicious approving contracts to call back into these functions during a transaction and manipulate state. An attacker could steal all approved...

Max deposit limit on assets per deposit on strategy on EigenLayer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Each strategy on EigenLayer has a maxPerDeposit it validates all individual deposits into the concerned strategy against. This is inclusive of the maxTotalDeposits against a strategy. These two upper limits are validated against deposits to the strategy,...