5561 matches found
CVE-2018-13719
The CVE-2018-13719 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the BiteduToken smart contract. Affected component: mintToken in the Ethereum ERC20-like BiteduToken implementation. Root cause: integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrar...
CVE-2018-13659
The CVE-2018-13659 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a BrianCoin smart contract (Ethereum token). The overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the core vulnerability: a numeric overflow in mintToken that break...
CVE-2018-13514
The CVE-2018-13514 entry concerns esportz, an Ethereum-based token. Connected sources confirm a vulnerability in the smart contract’s mintToken function caused by an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is described consistently acros...
CVE-2018-13781
CVE-2018-13781 concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a MyYLC Ethereum token smart contract. The cited description states an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a flawed balance-minting path likely not guarded by pr...
CVE-2018-13585
CHERRYCOIN is affected by CVE-2018-13585 due to an integer overflow in the mintToken function of its Ethereum smart contract. The overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value, constituting a direct integrity issue in the token implementation. The ava...
CVE-2018-13759
CVE-2018-13759 concerns the mintToken function of the BIGCAdvancedToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken, which the report states allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. This root cause enables potential balanc...
CVE-2018-13583
The CVE-2018-13583 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Shmoo (an Ethereum token). The vulnerability permits the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, indicating a control over token balances beyond int...
CVE-2018-13552
The CVE-2018-13552 entry corresponds to Trabet_Coin_PreICO, where the mintToken function of the Ethereum token’s smart contract contains an integer overflow. This overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Connected CNVD entry (Trabet_Coin_PreICO Integer O...
CVE-2018-13502
CVE-2018-13502 affects a HeliumNetwork smart contract (Ethereum token). The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in NVD as the root cause and impact (integrity manipulation, high impact per CV...
CVE-2018-13703
The CVE-2018-13703 entry concerns CERB_Coin: the mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability, with no public exploitation details provided in the connected documents. T...
CVE-2018-13522
CVE-2018-13522 concerns the mintToken function of EXGROUP’s smart contract (Ethereum token). The connected CNVD/CNVD-2018-13090 and NVD records describe an integer overflow in mintToken that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The exact affected versions an...
CVE-2018-13635
CVE-2018-13635 involves the mintToken function of a smart contract for the HBCM Ethereum token. A reported integer overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Public documents cite this behavior and its impact (potential integrity/import issues), with refer...
CVE-2018-13754
The CVE-2018-13754 entry concerns CryptosisToken, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function is reported to contain an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The available sources (NVD and related lists) confirm the vulnerability descripti...
CVE-2018-13663
The CVE-2018-13663 entry refers to BSCToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. The affected component is the smart contract implementation of BSCToken on Ethereum; the vulnerability’s root cause is an integer overflow i...
CVE-2018-13640
CVE-2018-13640 concerns the mintToken function of a smart-contract implementation for EthereumSmart, an Ethereum token. The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The connected documents confirm the root cause as an overflow an...
CVE-2018-13740
CVE-2018-13740 concerns the OneChain Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents confirm the affected component is the mintToken logic in OneChain’s contract; no vendor/vers...
CVE-2018-13616
The CVE-2018-13616 entry concerns the IOCT_Coin Ethereum token. The vulnerability is in the token’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents confirm the affected component as a smart contract implementation...
CVE-2018-13691
CVE-2018-13691 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the smart contract implementation for R Time Token v3 (RS) , specifically the contract named RTokenMain . This vulnerability allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The provide...
CVE-2018-13490
CVE-2018-13490 concerns the mintToken function of a FILM Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Impact stated: the owner can arbitrarily inflate balances, enabling manipulation of...
CVE-2018-13674
CVE-2018-13674 affects the ComBillAdvancedToken Ethereum token. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the underlying root cause and directly enables balance manipulation by the owner. The provid...