5562 matches found
CVE-2018-13679
The CVE-2018-13679 issue affects the ZPEcoin smart contract: the mintToken function incurs an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The vulnerability is described as a mint overflow in the Ethereum token implementation, with no explicit ...
CVE-2018-13673
The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GoldTokenERC20 (Ethereum token). The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Impact, as described in the sources, is that balance m...
CVE-2018-13548
CVE-2018-13548 concerns the mintToken function in a Mimicoin Ethereum smart contract. An integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling potential manipulation of token balances. The description and connected documents confirm the...
CVE-2018-13748
The CVE-2018-13748 entry concerns CarToken, a tradable Ethereum ERC-20-like token. The vulnerability is an integer overflow in the mintToken function of CarToken’s smart contract, which enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. This is documented in multipl...
CVE-2018-13560
CVE-2018-13560 affects a smart contract implementation for KelvinToken (Ethereum). The issue is in the mintToken function, where an integer overflow can allow the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The connected documents confirm the vulnerable component is the m...
CVE-2018-13484
The CVE-2018-13484 entry concerns the mintToken function of a CBRToken (Ethereum) smart contract. A reported integer overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Public references confirm this overflow condition in the mintToken code, indicating a privilege ...
CVE-2018-13631
The CVE-2018-13631 entry concerns a vulnerability in the doccoin Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value, representing an integrity risk for balances i...
CVE-2018-13746
The CVE-2018-13746 issue concerns the kBit Ethereum token’s smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Public sources (NVD/NVDB, CNVD, CNVD-2018-13040, PRION) describe it as an...
CVE-2018-13648
The CVE-2018-13648 entry concerns the mintToken function of a BGC Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Documents confirm the component and vulnerability but do not provide ex...
CVE-2018-13483
CVE-2018-13483 affects the mkethToken Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Exploitation details are not provided in the available documents. No remediation or fixed versi...
CVE-2018-13605
The CVE-2018-13605 entry concerns the mintToken function in Extreme Token (Extreme Coin) Ethereum contract (ExtremeToken). The root cause is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value. Documents consistently describe this vulnerabil...
CVE-2018-13652
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TheGoDigital, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13594
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CardFactory, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13647
The CVE-2018-13647 entry concerns a vulnerability in a TrueGoldCoinToken smart contract. The affected component is the mintToken function of the token’s Ethereum implementation. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance...
CVE-2018-13720
Summary: CVE-2018-13720 concerns Antoken, an Ethereum ERC20-like token. The mintToken function in Antoken’s smart contract is vulnerable to an integer overflow, which could allow the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. This is the explicit root cause described in...
CVE-2018-13609
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CSAToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13466
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Crystals, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13469
The CVE-2018-13469 issue affects a smart contract’s IcoContract mintToken function, where an integer overflow permits the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This describes a vulnerability in the token’s core minting logic that can corrupt balances and undermines token...
CVE-2018-13486
The CVE-2018-13486 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for HELP (an Ethereum token). The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is described in multiple sources (e.g., NVD/NI...
CVE-2018-13644
The CVE refers to the mintToken function in a RoyalClassicCoin Ethereum smart contract. It describes an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Impact stated: enables balance manipulation by the owner; no explicit exploitation deta...