CVE-2018-13506

The CVE-2018-13506 entry refers to a vulnerability in the SDR22 Ethereum token contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The affected component is the mintToken function within...

CVE-2018-13589

The CVE describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of MooAdvToken (an Ethereum token). The root cause is an overflow in the arithmetic that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This has the stated impact of compromising balance integrity. The con...

CVE-2018-13709

The CVE-2018-13709 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a Tube Ethereum token smart contract. An integer overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is described in the NVD record and mirrored by other sources in the connect...

CVE-2018-13694

CVE-2018-13694 concerns the GMile Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is in the contract’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This constitutes a critical integrity risk for token balances and could comprom...

CVE-2018-13480

The CVE-2018-13480 issue concerns a mintToken integer overflow in the QRG Ethereum token contract, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Affected component: mintToken function in the smart contract for QRG. Root cause: integer overflow within mintToken. Impa...

CVE-2018-13763

CVE-2018-13763 affects the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for the Ublasti Ethereum token. The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The available connected documents confirm th...

CVE-2018-13744

The CVE-2018-13744 entry concerns Crowdnext (CNX) Ethereum token smart contract MintToken function with an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The NVD/NVD-derived records confirm the vulnerability is a numeric overflow in MintToken; repor...

CVE-2018-13465

Technical details about CVE-2018-13465 are not publicly available in the provided connected documents. Monitor for updates from official advisories.

CVE-2018-13610

The CVE-2018-13610 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of MedicayunLink’s Ethereum token contract. The overflow permits the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s token balance, effectively enabling unauthorized balance manipulation. The vulnerability is rooted in ...

CVE-2018-13641

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MVGcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13496

The CVE-2018-13496 vulnerability concerns a mintToken function in a RajTestICO Ethereum smart contract that contains an integer overflow. The root cause allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, potentially enabling unauthorized minting or manipulation of tok...

CVE-2018-13777

The CVE-2018-13777 entry concerns a flaw in the mintToken function of a RRToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the concrete impact described across sources (NVD/NVD-derived record...

CVE-2018-13577

The CVE-2018-13577 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a ShitCoin (SHITC) Ethereum token implementation (Contract Name: AdvancedShit). The connected sources confirm a integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, r...

CVE-2018-13533

CVE-2018-13533 concerns ALUXToken, an Ethereum-based token. The connected CNVD/NVD entries describe an integer overflow in the mintToken function of ALUXToken’s smart contract. The root cause is an overflow in mintToken, which could allow the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to a...

CVE-2018-13696

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RedTicket, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13478

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13646

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Datiac, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13593

The CVE-2018-13593 entry concerns CardToken, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function has an integer overflow bug. The root cause described is an overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents confirm the affected component is the mintToken fu...

CVE-2018-13467

The CVE-2018-13467 issue concerns EpiphanyCoin’s smart contract MintToken: an integer overflow in the mintToken function. This overflow lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents confirm EpiphanyCoin is Ethereum-based and that the vulnerability resides in the ...

CVE-2018-13728

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for JixoCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...