Improper access control of claimAllForMember allows anyone to reduce the weight of a member

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact The claimAllForMember function of Dao is permissionless, allowing anyone to claim the unlocked bonded LP tokens for any member. However, claiming a member's LP tokens could decrease the member's weight in the BondVault, thus affecting the member's votes and...

PoolBase enables an easy withdrawal of funds

Handle walker Vulnerability details PoolBase enables an easy withdrawal of all funds severity: critical type: memory safety Description A memory safety bug in the pool base allows participants to trick the system into believing they're interacting with a pool's token. While in reality, they're...

Security Bulletin: Multiple Oracle Database Server Vulnerabilities Affect IBM Emptoris Contract Management

Summary Multiple Oracle database server security vulnerabilities affect IBM Emptoris Contract Management. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-2245 DESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server related to the Database - Enterprise Edition Unified Audit component could allow...

Security Bulletin: Oracle Database Server Vulnerability Affects IBM Emptoris Contract Management (CVE-2021-2207)

Summary An Oracle database server security vulnerabilities affect IBM Emptoris Contract Management. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-2207 DESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server related to the Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition component could allow an...

Pool: approveAndCall sets unnecessary approval

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details The Pool.approveAndCall function approves the recipient contract with the max value instead of only the required amount. Impact For safety, the approval should not be set to the max value, especially if the amount that the contract may us...

Synth: approveAndCall sets unnecessary approval

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details The Synth.approveAndCall function approves the recipient contract with the max value instead of only the required amount. Impact For safety, the approval should not be set to the max value, especially if the amount that the contract may u...

removeLiquiditySingle loses funds

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details The Pool.removeLiquiditySingle function redeems liquidity tokens for underlying to the router contract. If toBase == true, it then tries to convert these to base tokens. However, only the swapped token - BASE amount is sent to the user, t...

Deflationary and fee-on-transfer tokens are not correctly accounted

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact When a user transfers deflationary or fee-on-transfer tokens to the LendingPair, the pair does not correctly handle the received amount, causing the minted LP token amount to be greater than the received amount. Transactions calling the withdrawAll function...

Loss of funds from contract

Handle 0xsanson Vulnerability details Impact User and router can collude to exploit the contract and steal funds any erc20 tokens in the following way. They can set the callTo to an exploit contract that can call the receivingAssetId.transferFrom function. The logic in the fulfill function approv...

receive funds 2x

Handle gpersoon Vulnerability details Impact When the function fulfill tries to call the functions of a receiving contract callTo and toSend 0: it first calls addFunds and if that fails that it transfers the funds via transferAsset it secondly calls execute and if that fails that it transfers the...

Use of deprecated Chainlink API

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The contracts use Chainlink’s deprecated API latestAnswer. Such functions might suddenly stop working if Chainlink stopped supporting deprecated APIs. Impact: Deprecated API stops working. Prices cannot be obtained. Protocol stops and contracts have to...

No support for token with decimals > 18

Handle s1m0 Vulnerability details Impact The smart contract doesn't behave correctly if deployed with token that have decimals 18. Proof of Concept The functions tokenToWad and wadToToken revert if the tokenDecimals is 18. These functions are called in critical places like deposit and withdraw...

Wrong trading pricing calculations

Handle 0xsanson Vulnerability details Impact In the Pricing contract, an agent can manipulate the trading prices by spamming an high amount of trades. Indeed an agent can create an high amount of orders at an arbitrary price and with a near-zero amount so the agent doesn't even need large funds;...

Insurance slippage reimbursement can be used to steal insurance fund

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The Liquidation contract allows the liquidator to submit "bad" trade orders and the insurance reimburses them from the insurance fund, see Liquidation.claimReceipt. The function can be called with an orders array which does not check for duplicate orders. An...

No check transferFrom() return value

Handle s1m0 Vulnerability details Impact The smart contract doesn't check the return value of token.transfer and token.transferFrom, some erc20 token might not revert in case of error but return false. In the TracerPerpetualSwaps:deposit and Insurance:deposit this would allow a user to deposit fo...

Use of deprecated Chainlink API

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The contracts use Chainlink’s deprecated API latestAnswer. Such functions might suddenly stop working if Chainlink stopped supporting deprecated APIs. Impact: Deprecated API stops working. Prices cannot be obtained. Protocol stops and contracts have to...

GHSA-69V6-XC2J-R2JF Shallow copy bug in geth

Impact This is a Consensus vulnerability, which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth’s pre-compiled dataCopy at 0x00...04 contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that - writes X to an EVM memory region R,...

Shallow copy bug in geth

Impact This is a Consensus vulnerability, which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth’s pre-compiled dataCopy at 0x00...04 contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that - writes X to an EVM memory region R,...

CVE-2020-17753

An issue was discovered in function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation for RC, an Ethereum token, allows attackers to transfer an arbitrary amount of tokens to an arbitrary address...

CVE-2020-17752

Integer overflow vulnerability in payable function of a smart contract implementation for an Ethereum token, as demonstrated by the smart contract implemented at address 0xB49E984A83d7A638E7F2889fc8328952BA951AbE, an implementation for MillionCoin MON...