NestedFactory: Ensure zero msg.value if transferring from user and inputToken is not ETH

Handle GreyArt Vulnerability details Impact A user that mistakenly calls either create or addToken with WETH or another ERC20 as the input token, but includes native ETH with the function call will have his native ETH permanently locked in the contract. Recommended Mitigation Steps It is best to...

setGuardian() Privilage Escalation Causing Governance Lose Control of The Contract

Handle Meta0xNull Vulnerability details Impact governance = guardian The Guardian will become Governance of the Contract which is Not Expected. Original Governance will lose control of this contract if they call setGuardian with Address/Key beyong their control. Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual...

Access control : wrongly setting the new guardian address to governance address

Handle ksk2345 Vulnerability details Impact Impact is high; once a new guardian is set using 'setGuardian' function, the new guardian is in full control of the contract, due to this bug. The setGuardian function mistakenly sets the governance address instead of setting it to guardian. Proof of...

Missing _token.approve() to curvePool in setZapConfig

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details function setZapConfig uint256 idx, address sett, address token, address curvePool, address withdrawToken, int128 withdrawTokenIndex external onlyGovernance; requiresett != address0; requiretoken != address0; require withdrawToken == addressWBTC || withdrawTok...

@biconomy/hyphen-contracts (1.0.4), @bobanetwork/contracts (0.0.2) +17 more potentially affected by unknown CVE via @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable (>=4.2.0, <=4.3.2)

@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable NPM version =4.2.0, =0.0.1, =0.5.0, =3.4.0, =1.1.2, =1.0.1, =1.1.2, =1.0.0, =0.8.1-pr-brioux-1333.92b26c3a.36, =1.0.5, =2.3.0, =2.0.0, =3.0.0-beta, =3.0.1 and more Source cves: unknown CVE Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-WMPV-C2JP-J2XG...

@avalabs/avalanche-wallet-sdk (>=0.9.5, <=0.10.2), @b0dhidharma/contract-utils (0.1.1) +66 more potentially affected by unknown CVE via @openzeppelin/contracts (>=4.2.0, <=4.3.2)

@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version =4.2.0, =0.9.5, =0.0.2, =0.0.1, =0.0.1, =1.0.0, =0.0.1, =1.1.0, =0.0.1, =3.0.0-alpha.2, =3.0.0-alpha.1, =3.0.0-alpha.1, =3.0.0-alpha.1, =3.0.0-alpha.4 and more Source cves: unknown CVE Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-WMPV-C2JP-J2XG...

Unbounded loops

Handle pauliax Vulnerability details Impact There are several loops in the contract which can eventually grow so large as to make future operations of the contract cost too much gas to fit in a block. Specifically, in contract TwapOracle there is no upper boundary on how many pairs can be...

Missing duplicate veto check

Handle defsec Vulnerability details Impact On the GovernorAlpha contract, function veto has been added. Although the function behaviour is expected, duplicate veto process has not been checked on that function. Proof of Concept 1. Navigate to following contract line. function vetouint256...

Zap contract's redeem() function might transfer more tokens than the user should be able to receive

Handle Ruhum Vulnerability details Impact The redeem function transfers the whole balance of the specified token to the user. That can be more than the amount the user should receive. Because at the time of the call to redeem the Zap contract's balance of the passed token might not be 0. Proof of...

Zap contract's redeem() function doesn't check which token the user wants to receive

Handle Ruhum Vulnerability details Impact In the redeem function, the user can pass a token address. That's the token they receive in return for the ibbtc they give back. Because of missing address checks the user can provide any possible ERC20 token here without the function reverting. Although...

CVE-2021-41264

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. In affected versions upgradeable contracts using UUPSUpgradeable may be vulnerable to an attack affecting uninitialized implementation contracts. A fix is included in version 4.3.2 of @openzeppelin/contracts and...

CVE-2021-41264

OpenZeppelin CVE-2021-41264 affects upgradeable contracts using UUPSUpgradeable due to uninitialized implementation contracts. The vulnerability is addressed in version 4.3.2 of @openzeppelin/contracts and @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable. If upgrading is not possible, a mitigation is to initi...

FSDVesting.claimTribute() Breaks Contract

Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact FSDVesting.claimTribute attempts to claim staking rewards which are stored as tributes and generated through membership purchases by the FSD network. The FSDVesting.sol contract accrues a conviction score which generates a percentage claim over tribut...

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in versions of OpenZeppelin Contracts prior to 4.3.2, which can be exploited by an attacker to conduct an uninitialized contract attack...

Security Bulletin: Oracle Database Server Vulnerability Affects IBM Emptoris Contract Management (CVE-2021-2438)

Summary An Oracle Database Server security vulnerability has been addressed in IBM Emptoris Contract Management. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-2438 DESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server related to the Java VM component could allow an authenticated attacker to...

Security Bulletin: Oracle Database Server Vulnerability Affects IBM Emptoris Contract Management (CVE-2021-2333)

Summary An Oracle Database Server security vulnerability has been addressed in IBM Emptoris Contract Management. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-2333 DESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server related to the XML DB component could allow an authenticated attacker to...

Inconsistent balance when supplying transfer-on-fee or deflationary tokens

Handle Reigada Vulnerability details Impact In the contract StakingRewards, the stake function assume that the amount of stakingToken is transferred to the smart contract after calling the safeTransferFrom function and thus it updates the balances mapping. However, this may not be true if the...

Missing access restriction on Vesting.updateVestedTokens

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The FSDVesting.updateVestedTokens function is supposed to be called by the FDS contract only which also mints tokens to the contract. However, it does not have any access restrictions which leads to circumventing the vesting and further griefing attacks. POC...

Anyone can DDOS vesting contract

Handle pauliax Vulnerability details Impact Vest function can be accessed by anyone. It accepts arbitrary beneficiary and pushes new vesting to the array of this beneficiary timelocks. As a malicious actor I can block any user by just invoking vest function with a tiny amount of vest token. The...

Unchecked low level calls

Handle Reigada Vulnerability details Impact The return value of these low-level calls are not checked, so if the call fails, the Ether will be locked in the contract. Setting the risk as medium as the smart contract has no function to withdraw the Ether. This Ether would remain stuck in the...