Attacker could make deposits of 1 wei in the yield contract to prevent excess rewards from being withdrawn

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept If an attacker makes many deposits of 1 wei the staking pool creator will have to make the withdraws himself to remove the unclaimed reward tokens. This can mean the pool creator will...

Creator of the contract could front run tax per capita to 100% of Yield rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Contract creator could steal all rewards using frontrunning Proof of Concept When a yield pool is created pool tax is set equal to global tax and funds are sent into the contract to pay for rewards. The contract creator could set tax to 100% in a...

steal user funds with front-running when he calls depositTokens() of MerkleVesting and MerkleResistor with wrong treeIndex (uninitiated)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This nature of this bug is similar in MerkleVesting and MerkleResistor and MerkleDropFactory, so I only write MerkleDropFactory version: If a user calls depositTokens with wrong treeIndex value by mistake, attacker can perform front-running attack and...

if user send uninitialized poolId to function deposit() of PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory, then attacker can cause user fund to be locked forever, and only unlock it if user pays ransom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function deposit of PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory supposed to revert if user send uninitialized poolId by mistake, but if user does this, attacker can perform front-running attack and create multiple pools with his smart contract and be owner of that...

[SECURITY] Fedora 36 Update: golang-github-pact-foundation-1.5.1-5.fc36

Pact Go enables consumer driven contract testing, providing a mock service and DSL for the consumer project, and interaction playback and verification for t he service provider project...

The Contract Should approve(0) first

Originally submitted by warden defsec in 198, duplicate of 178 related to the use of safeApprove. This is upgraded from a QA report to standalone issue because it correctly described the revert when trying to call safeApprove on non-zero allowance. QA report that only describe safeApprove as...

call() should be used instead of transfer() on an address payable

Lines of code Vulnerability details This is a classic Code4rena issue: instead of call , transfer is used to withdraw the ether 2021-04-meebits-findings2 Swap.sol implements potentially dangerous transfer 2021-10-tally-findings20 OpenLevV1Lib's and LPool's doTransferOut functions call native...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (3)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (10)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (7)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (13)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (15)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (8)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (11)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (1)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (18)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (14)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (5)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (2)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

VaultCore's withdrawETH uses transfer function, which can be unusable for some smart contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user wishes to withdraw their collateral from a WETH vault, the funds are returned to the user with msg.sender.transfer. Using transfer is not recommended anymore, especially for critical operations like withdrawing collateral from a vault as it...