Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12079

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Buffer overflow

The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...

Design/Logic Flaw

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12078

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12084

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin SWFTC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12063

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable...

Design/Logic Flaw

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12080

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12068

The CVE-2018-12068 issue concerns a math overflow in the sell() function of the Target Coin (TGT) ERC20 contract. The vulnerability arises from overflow in multiplying the argument amount by a manipulable sellPrice, enabling a potential trap (tradeTrap) that could cause financial damage to the se...

CVE-2018-12070

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...

CVE-2018-12082

The CVE-2018-12082 entry concerns Fujinto (NTO) ERC20 token smart contract where the mintToken function has no period constraint. This allows the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply, enabling profit by altering supply. Connected sources corroborate the same description across NVD/CNVD/PRIO...

CVE-2018-12067

Summary: CVE-2018-12067 affects Substratum (SUB), an Ethereum ERC20 token. Multiple sources describe a vulnerability in the tradeTrap mechanism: the sell function can overflow due to the multiplication of the input amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, enabling a potential financial loss t...

CVE-2018-12063

Technical details sufficient to assess impact (affected software, root cause, vulnerable components, or fixes) are not publicly provided in the supplied documents. Monitor for updates from official advisories.

CVE-2018-12083

The CVE-2018-12083 entry concerns GOAL Bonanza (GOAL), an Ethereum ERC20 token whose smart-contract mintToken function has no period constraint, enabling the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply. This minting oversight creates a supply manipulation risk described as the tradeTrap. Affected ...

CVE-2018-12062

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin SWFTC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12083

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...