6131 matches found
CVE-2018-13568
The CVE-2018-13568 entry concerns a smart contract (MktCoin) with a mintToken function that contains an integer overflow. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value, revealing a control over user balances via this overflow. The provided sourc...
CVE-2018-13601
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GalacticX, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13730
CVE-2018-13730 affects HEY, an Ethereum ERC-20 token. The mintToken function in HEY’s smart contract has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the root cause and represents the vulnerability, per multiple connected sources (CNVD-201...
CVE-2018-13680
The CVE-2018-13680 entry concerns the mintToken function of the LexitToken Ethereum smart contract, where an integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to an arbitrary value. The affected component is a smart contract implementation for Lexit...
CVE-2018-13613
The CVE-2018-13613 entry concerns the mintToken function of a CON0217 Ethereum token smart contract. A reported integer overflow in mintToken allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, enabling balance manipulation. The affected software is a smart contract impleme...
CVE-2018-13563
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for UPayToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13689
CVE-2018-13689 affects the CJXToken Ethereum smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: overflow in mintToken. Impact: potential unauthorized credit of balances; violates token integrity. Ex...
CVE-2018-13749
The CVE-2018-13749 issue affects FinalToken, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling balance manipulation. Connected sources describe the vulnerability but do not provide patch detai...
CVE-2018-13733
CVE-2018-13733 concerns a smart contract for ProjectJ. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The description specifies the vulnerability and impact (ownership enables arbitrary balance manipulation) but ...
CVE-2018-13509
CVE-2018-13509 concerns the IamRich Ethereum token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is described across multiple sources (CNVD-2018-13188, NVD/NVD data, etc.) as the root cause. The impact is arbit...
CVE-2018-13619
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MicoinToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13720
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Antoken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13614
CVE-2018-13614 affects the MAVCash Ethereum token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The provided documents state the root cause and impact (unauthorized balance manipulation). No explicit exploitation st...
CVE-2018-13489
CVE-2018-13489 concerns the OllisCoin Ethereum token. The MintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that effectively lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The issue is described in multiple sources as a vulnerability in the toke...
CVE-2018-13493
The CVE concerns a smart contract vulnerability in DaddyToken: the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Affected software is a Ethereum token contract; the root cause is overflow in the mintToken implementation,...
CVE-2018-13469
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IcoContract, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13586
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Nectar NCTR, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13732
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RiptideCoin RIPT, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13717
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for HormitechToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13497
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for COBToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...