CVE-2018-13615

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MJCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13616

The CVE-2018-13616 entry concerns the IOCT_Coin Ethereum token. The vulnerability is in the token’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents confirm the affected component as a smart contract implementation...

CVE-2018-13619

The CVE-2018-13619 entry concerns MicoinToken, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract implementation has an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This could enable balance inflation for the owner’s addres...

CVE-2018-13613

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CON0217, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13612

CVE-2018-13612 concerns the mintToken function of Robincoin’s Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, enabling unauthorized balance manipulation by the owner. The available documents des...

CVE-2018-13563

The CVE-2018-13563 issue affects the UPayToken Ethereum token: the mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is a functional integrity risk in the token’s accounting, potentially enabling balance manipulation without...

CVE-2018-13556

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for COSMOTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13557

The CVE-2018-13557 issue concerns a smart contract for Trabet_Coin where the mintToken function has an integer overflow . This vulnerability could allow the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, representing an impact on balance integrity. The root cause is an overf...

CVE-2018-13564

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GATcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13565

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Co2Bit, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13475

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for VSCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13490

CVE-2018-13490 concerns the mintToken function of a FILM Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Impact stated: the owner can arbitrarily inflate balances, enabling manipulation of...

CVE-2018-13493

The CVE concerns a smart contract vulnerability in DaddyToken: the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Affected software is a Ethereum token contract; the root cause is overflow in the mintToken implementation,...

CVE-2018-13488

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Crypto Alley Shares CAST, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13489

CVE-2018-13489 concerns the OllisCoin Ethereum token. The MintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that effectively lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The issue is described in multiple sources as a vulnerability in the toke...

CVE-2018-13462

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MoonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13529

The connected documents confirm CVE-2018-13529 as an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the BetterThanAdrien Ethereum token smart contract. This vulnerability allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: overflow in mintToken. The sources do no...

CVE-2018-13531

CVE-2018-13531 concerns the mintToken function of MaxHouse, an Ethereum token, where an integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to set any user balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is rooted in arithmetic handling within the token minting logic, potentially enabling unauthori...

CVE-2018-13526

CVE-2018-13526 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of WangWangToken’s smart contract. The overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documented details come from multiple sources (NVD/CNVD/others) without confirmation of exploitation st...

CVE-2018-13528

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DhaCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...