CVE-2018-13668

The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a BTPCoin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact is described as enabling balance manipulation by the owner, wi...

CVE-2018-13681

The vulnerability CVE-2018-13681 concerns the mintToken function of the SOSCoin Ethereum token smart contract. It contains an integer overflow in its balance manipulation, which allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This affects SOSCoin’s token integrity ...

CVE-2018-13677

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Goochain, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13678

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Lottery, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13654

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ESTSToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13655

CVE-2018-13655 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for the GFC Ethereum token. The underlying issue is an integer overflow in mintToken, which allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The available connected documents confirm t...

CVE-2018-13657

CVE-2018-13657 concerns the Rice Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling unauthorized balance manipulation. No remediation details are provided in the con...

CVE-2018-13663

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BSCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13664

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CWS, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13590

The CVE-2018-13590 entry concerns SIPCOIN’s smart contract mintToken function, where an integer overflow in the mintToken implementation enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. Affected product: SIPCOIN Ethereum token contract; vulnerable component: mintToken (integer ov...

CVE-2018-13588

CVE-2018-13588 concerns Code47 (C47), a Code47 Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function is reported to suffer an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The concrete impact described is balance manipulation by the owner, ...

CVE-2018-13699

The CVE-2018-13699 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a DestiNeed (DSN) Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is described as an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Several connected records (NVD entry,...

CVE-2018-13543

The CVE-2018-13543 entry concerns GemstoneToken, an Ethereum token implemented as a smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact. The provided connec...

CVE-2018-13477

CVE-2018-13477 affects CTESale, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Connected sources reference the overflow in the mint logic and point to related project ...

CVE-2018-13574

The CVE concerns DataShieldCoin, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This underlying issue is described in the CVE entry and linked references, with t...

CVE-2018-13715

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BpsToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13551

The CVE-2018-13551 entry concerns the Bgamecoin smart contract (ERC20-like token). The connected documents describe a vulnerability in the mintToken function where an integer overflow permits the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the explicit root cause ...

CVE-2018-13554

CVE-2018-13554 concerns MoneyTree (TREE), an Ethereum token. The connected CNVD/CNVD-2018-13272 and CNVD-derived entries confirm a vulnerability in the token’s smart contract where the mintToken function has an integer overflow. This overflow lets the contract owner set the balance of any arbitra...

CVE-2018-13535

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PACCOIN, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13732

The CVE-2018-13732 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementing RiptideCoin (RIPT). The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is described in the NVD entry and linked references (e.g., BlockCh...