Lucene search
+L

6494 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/30 12:00 a.m.•22 views

No check transferFrom() return value

Handle s1m0 Vulnerability details Impact The smart contract doesn't check the return value of token.transfer and token.transferFrom, some erc20 token might not revert in case of error but return false. In the TracerPerpetualSwaps:deposit and Insurance:deposit this would allow a user to deposit fo...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/30 12:00 a.m.•21 views

No support for token with decimals > 18

Handle s1m0 Vulnerability details Impact The smart contract doesn't behave correctly if deployed with token that have decimals 18. Proof of Concept The functions tokenToWad and wadToToken revert if the tokenDecimals is 18. These functions are called in critical places like deposit and withdraw...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2021/06/29 9:13 p.m.•97 views

Shallow copy bug in geth

Impact This is a Consensus vulnerability, which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth’s pre-compiled dataCopy at 0x00...04 contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that - writes X to an EVM memory region R,...

7.1CVSS6.8AI score0.01226EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
osv_ghsa
osv_ghsa
•added 2021/06/29 9:13 p.m.•54 views

GHSA-69V6-XC2J-R2JF Shallow copy bug in geth

Impact This is a Consensus vulnerability, which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth’s pre-compiled dataCopy at 0x00...04 contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that - writes X to an EVM memory region R,...

6.5CVSS6.8AI score0.01226EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
NVD
NVD
•added 2021/06/24 8:15 p.m.•28 views

CVE-2020-17753

An issue was discovered in function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation for RC, an Ethereum token, allows attackers to transfer an arbitrary amount of tokens to an arbitrary address...

6.5CVSS0.01508EPSS
SaveExploits1References7
NVD
NVD
•added 2021/06/24 8:15 p.m.•20 views

CVE-2020-17752

Integer overflow vulnerability in payable function of a smart contract implementation for an Ethereum token, as demonstrated by the smart contract implemented at address 0xB49E984A83d7A638E7F2889fc8328952BA951AbE, an implementation for MillionCoin MON...

9.8CVSS0.01579EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
Prion
Prion
•added 2021/06/24 8:15 p.m.•20 views

Code injection

An issue was discovered in function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation for RC, an Ethereum token, allows attackers to transfer an arbitrary amount of tokens to an arbitrary address...

4.3CVSS6.5AI score0.01508EPSS
SaveExploits1References7
Prion
Prion
•added 2021/06/24 8:15 p.m.•19 views

Integer overflow

Integer overflow vulnerability in payable function of a smart contract implementation for an Ethereum token, as demonstrated by the smart contract implemented at address 0xB49E984A83d7A638E7F2889fc8328952BA951AbE, an implementation for MillionCoin MON...

7.5CVSS9.5AI score0.01579EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2021/06/24 7:16 p.m.•33 views

CVE-2020-17752

Integer overflow vulnerability in payable function of a smart contract implementation for an Ethereum token, as demonstrated by the smart contract implemented at address 0xB49E984A83d7A638E7F2889fc8328952BA951AbE, an implementation for MillionCoin MON...

9.6AI score0.01579EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
CVE
CVE
•added 2021/06/24 7:16 p.m.•72 views

CVE-2020-17752

CVE-2020-17752 corresponds to an integer overflow in the payable function of a smart-contract implementation for Ethereum token MillionCoin (MON). The vulnerable contract is at 0xB49E984A83d7A638E7F2889fc8328952BA951AbE. Documented impact is partial confidentiality/integrity/availability (per CVS...

9.8CVSS9.4AI score0.01579EPSS
SaveExploits1References2Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2021/06/24 7:16 p.m.•33 views

CVE-2020-17753

An issue was discovered in function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation for RC, an Ethereum token, allows attackers to transfer an arbitrary amount of tokens to an arbitrary address...

6.5AI score0.01508EPSS
SaveExploits1References7
CVE
CVE
•added 2021/06/24 7:16 p.m.•87 views

CVE-2020-17753

The CVE-2020-17753 entry concerns the RC Ethereum token smart contract. A vulnerability in the function addMeByRC allows an attacker to transfer an arbitrary amount of tokens to an arbitrary address. Public sources (NVD/NVD-derived entries and related records) confirm the affected component as th...

6.5CVSS6.5AI score0.01508EPSS
SaveExploits1References7Affected Software2
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/24 12:00 a.m.•13 views

Using transferFrom on ERC721 tokens

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact In the function awardExternalERC721 of contract PrizePool, when awarding external ERC721 tokens to the winners, the transferFrom keyword is used instead of safeTransferFrom. If any winner is a contract and is not aware of incoming ERC721 tokens, the sent...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2021/06/24 12:00 a.m.•2 views

PT-2021-10109

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: MillionCoin MON affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to an integer overflow vulnerability in the payable function of a smart contract implementation for an Ethereum token. This vulnerability is demonstrated by the...

9.8CVSS0.01579EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2021/06/24 12:00 a.m.•6 views

CVE-2020-17753: Undefined Security Weakness

An issue was discovered in function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation for RC, an Ethereum token, allows attackers to transfer an arbitrary amount of tokens to an arbitrary address...

6.5CVSS5.9AI score0.01508EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2021/06/24 12:00 a.m.•16 views

Ethereum token security vulnerabilities

The Ethereum token is a digital currency of the Ether Ethereum community. The Ethereum token suffers from a security vulnerability that stems from an issue discovered in the function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation of the Ethereum token RC, which allows an attacker to transfer an...

6.5CVSS6.7AI score0.01508EPSS
SaveExploits1References8
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/23 12:00 a.m.•13 views

The assumption that operator == to (user) may not hold leading to failed timelock deposits

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The contract uses msgSender to denote an operator who is operating on behalf of the user. This is typically used for meta-transactions where the operator is an intermediary/relayer who may facilitate gasless transactions on behalf of the user. They may...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/23 12:00 a.m.•17 views

Test configuration carryover to production deployment limits pool users to 5

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The project uses a data structure for indexing ticket tokens/users called SortitionSumTreeFactory which as explained in the overview video time 14:20-14:50 is used to capture users’ token balances in the leaves where internal nodes represent their sums...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/23 12:00 a.m.•14 views

Actual yield source check on address will succeed for non-existent contract

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact Low-level calls call/delegatecall/staticcall return true even if the account called is non-existent per EVM design. Solidity documentation warns: "The low-level functions call, delegatecall and staticcall return true as their first return value if the...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/06/17 12:00 a.m.•34 views

Return values of ERC20 transfer and transferFrom are unchecked

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact In the contract RCTreasury, the return values of ERC20 transfer and transferFrom are not checked, which could be false if the transferred token is not ERC20-compliant. In that case, the transfer fails without being noticed by the calling contract. Proof of...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder