Lucene search
+L

61 matches found

NVD
NVD
•added 2026/03/31 3:16 p.m.•31 views

CVE-2026-34377

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2026/03/31 2:05 p.m.•38 views

CVE-2026-34377 Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS5.7AI score
SaveExploits0References5
attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2026/03/31 2:05 p.m.•17 views

CVE-2026-34377

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS5.7AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References4Affected Software2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/03/31 2:05 p.m.•46 views

CVE-2026-34377 Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/03/31 2:05 p.m.•7 views

CVE-2026-34377

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.7CVSS5.7AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References7
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/03/31 2:05 p.m.•6 views

CVE-2026-34377 Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS5.7AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2026/03/31 12:00 a.m.•10 views

CVE-2026-34377: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS5.7AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References4
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2026/03/30 7:13 p.m.•55 views

Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

--- CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data Summary A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause...

8.4CVSS5.8AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References6Affected Software2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/03/30 12:00 a.m.•28 views

PT-2026-29168

--- CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data Summary A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause...

8.4CVSS5.8AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References8
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/03 8:07 p.m.•21 views

EUVD-2022-3638

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2025/02/06 12:00 a.m.•21 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS6.6AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2022/05/24 10:21 p.m.•50 views

AttesterSlashing number overflow

Impact Possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Since we represent uint64 values as native javascript numbers, there is an issue when those variables with large greater than 2^53 uint64 values are included on chain. In those...

7.5CVSS7.2AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
osv_ghsa
osv_ghsa
•added 2022/05/24 10:21 p.m.•103 views

GHSA-CVJ7-5F3C-9VG9 AttesterSlashing number overflow

Impact Possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Since we represent uint64 values as native javascript numbers, there is an issue when those variables with large greater than 2^53 uint64 values are included on chain. In those...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
NVD
NVD
•added 2022/05/24 3:15 p.m.•67 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Mend
Mend
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•7 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted "AttesterSlashing" or "ProposerSlashing" being included on-chain. Because the developers represent "uint64" values as native...

8.7CVSS0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References6
CVE
CVE
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•128 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar (TypeScript Ethereum Consensus) before v0.36.0 is vulnerable due to using native JavaScript numbers for uint64 values in AttesterSlashing/ProposerSlashing, causing rounding errors for large values (>2^53). This can yield consensus splits or valid Slashing being treated as invalid, pot...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•60 views

CVE-2022-29219 Integer Overflow in Lodestar

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS7.7AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•51 views

CVE-2022-29219 Integer Overflow in Lodestar

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score
SaveExploits0References5
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2022/05/24 12:00 a.m.•20 views

Lodestar input validation vulnerability

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of Ethernet consensus. Versions of Lodestar prior to 0.36.0 suffer from an input validation error vulnerability that stems from the inclusion of maliciously crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing on the chain, which may have a consensus split...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2022/05/24 12:00 a.m.•5 views

PT-2022-19471

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Lodestar versions prior to 0.36.0 Description The issue is related to the representation of uint64 values as native JavaScript numbers in Lodestar, a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. When uint64 values greater...

7.5CVSS0.01344EPSS
SaveExploits0References9
Rows per page
Query Builder