Lucene search
+L

53 matches found

Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2026/03/31 12:00 a.m.•1 views

CVE-2026-34377: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid...

8.4CVSS5.8AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References4
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2026/03/30 7:13 p.m.•53 views

Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

--- CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data Summary A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause...

8.4CVSS5.8AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References6Affected Software2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/03/30 12:00 a.m.•25 views

PT-2026-29168

--- CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data Summary A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause...

8.4CVSS5.9AI score0.00383EPSS
SaveExploits1References8
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/03 8:07 p.m.•14 views

EUVD-2022-3638

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2025/02/06 12:00 a.m.•18 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS6.6AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2022/05/24 10:21 p.m.•43 views

AttesterSlashing number overflow

Impact Possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Since we represent uint64 values as native javascript numbers, there is an issue when those variables with large greater than 2^53 uint64 values are included on chain. In those...

7.5CVSS7.2AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2022/05/24 10:21 p.m.•95 views

GHSA-CVJ7-5F3C-9VG9 AttesterSlashing number overflow

Impact Possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Since we represent uint64 values as native javascript numbers, there is an issue when those variables with large greater than 2^53 uint64 values are included on chain. In those...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
NVD
NVD
•added 2022/05/24 3:15 p.m.•62 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•120 views

CVE-2022-29219

Lodestar (TypeScript Ethereum Consensus) before v0.36.0 is vulnerable due to using native JavaScript numbers for uint64 values in AttesterSlashing/ProposerSlashing, causing rounding errors for large values (>2^53). This can yield consensus splits or valid Slashing being treated as invalid, pot...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•50 views

CVE-2022-29219 Integer Overflow in Lodestar

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score
SaveExploits0References5
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2022/05/24 2:15 p.m.•57 views

CVE-2022-29219 Integer Overflow in Lodestar

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS7.7AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2022/05/24 12:00 a.m.•16 views

Lodestar 输入验证错误漏洞

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of Ethernet consensus. Versions of Lodestar prior to 0.36.0 suffer from an input validation error vulnerability that stems from the inclusion of maliciously crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing on the chain, which may have a consensus split...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2022/05/24 12:00 a.m.•6 views

CVE-2022-29219: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain. Because the developers represent uint64 values as native javascript...

7.5CVSS7.1AI score0.01323EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Rows per page
Query Builder