Code injection

Ypsomed mylife Cloud, mylife Mobile Application, Ypsomed mylife Cloud: All versions prior to 1.7.2, Ypsomed mylife App: All versions prior to 1.7.5,The application layer encryption of the communication protocol between the Ypsomed mylife App and mylife Cloud uses non-random IVs, which allows...

CVE-2021-27503

Ypsomed mylife Cloud, mylife Mobile Application, Ypsomed mylife Cloud: All versions prior to 1.7.2, Ypsomed mylife App: All versions prior to 1.7.5,The application encrypts on the application layer of the communication protocol between the Ypsomed mylife App and mylife Cloud credentials based on...

CVE-2021-27503

CVE-2021-27503 affects Ypsomed mylife Cloud (all versions before 1.7.2) and mylife App (before 1.7.5). The root cause is encryption at the application layer based on hard-coded secrets in the client–server protocol, which can enable man-in-the-middle tampering of messages. The Red Hat and other s...

CVE-2021-27499

Ypsomed mylife Cloud, mylife Mobile Application, Ypsomed mylife Cloud: All versions prior to 1.7.2, Ypsomed mylife App: All versions prior to 1.7.5,The application layer encryption of the communication protocol between the Ypsomed mylife App and mylife Cloud uses non-random IVs, which allows...

CVE-2021-27499

Summary: CVE-2021-27499 affects Ypsomed mylife Cloud (pre-1.7.2) and mylife App (pre-1.7.5). The root cause is use of non-random IVs in the CBC-mode encryption of the communication protocol between the mylife App and mylife Cloud, allowing an attacker to tamper with messages and potentially affec...

Ypsomed mylife App trust management issue vulnerability

Ypsomed mylife App is an application of Ypsomed AG. To optimize communication between people with diabetes and healthcare professionals, mylife Therapy Management is an easy-to-use, easy-to-share solution for diabetes therapy data. mylife App is vulnerable to a trust management issue, which stems...

CVE-2020-27269

In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications lacks replay protection measures, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to replay communication sequences...

CVE-2020-27269

In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications lacks replay protection measures, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to replay communication sequences...

CVE-2020-27269

CVE-2020-27269 affects Dana Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i, and AnyDana-A insulin pumps and their mobile apps. The root cause is the absence of replay protection in the Bluetooth Low Energy communication protocol, enabling unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to replay legitimate sequences. P...

Information disclosure

In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, an information disclosure vulnerability in the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows unauthenticated attackers to extract the pump’s keypad lock PIN via Bluetooth...

CVE-2020-27258

The CVE-2020-27258 issue affects SOOIL Dana Diabecare RS pumps and the AnyDana-i/AnyDana-A mobile apps. It is an information-disclosure vulnerability in the BLE communication protocol that allows unauthenticated attackers within Bluetooth proximity to extract the pump keypad lock PIN. Public sour...

CVE-2020-27258

In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, an information disclosure vulnerability in the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows unauthenticated attackers to extract the pump’s keypad lock PIN via Bluetooth...

CVE-2020-27272

SOOIL Developments CoLtd DiabecareRS, AnyDana-i, AnyDana-A, The communication protocol of the insulin pump and AnyDana-i,AnyDana-A mobile apps doesn't use adequate measures to authenticate the pump before exchanging keys, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to eavesdrop t...

Code injection

SOOIL Developments CoLtd DiabecareRS, AnyDana-i, AnyDana-A, The communication protocol of the insulin pump and AnyDana-i,AnyDana-A mobile apps doesn't use adequate measures to authenticate the pump before exchanging keys, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to eavesdrop t...

Authentication flaw

SOOIL Developments Co Ltd DiabecareRS,AnyDana-i & AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i & AnyDana-A mobile apps doesn't use adequate measures to authenticate the communicating entities before exchanging keys, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate...

Code injection

SOOIL Developments CoLtd DiabecareRS, AnyDana-i ,AnyDana-A, communication protocol of the insulin pump & AnyDana-i,AnyDana-A mobile apps doesnt use adequate measures to protect encryption keys in transit which allows unauthenticated physically proximate attacker to sniff keys via BLE...

CVE-2020-27272

SOOIL Developments CoLtd DiabecareRS, AnyDana-i, AnyDana-A, The communication protocol of the insulin pump and AnyDana-i,AnyDana-A mobile apps doesn't use adequate measures to authenticate the pump before exchanging keys, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to eavesdrop t...

CVE-2020-27272

CVE-2020-27272 affects Dana Diabecare RS pumps and AnyDana-i/AnyDana-A apps. Root cause: the BLE-based key exchange lacks adequate entity authentication, allowing unauthenticated, proximate attackers to eavesdrop on keys and spoof the pump. Impact includes potential manipulation of therapy settin...

File Containment Vulnerability in netcall of Hangzhou Xinzhongda Technology Co.

netcall is based on the open source communication protocol xmpp development of instant messaging software . A file inclusion vulnerability exists in netcall of Hangzhou New CU Technology Co. Ltd, which can be exploited by an attacker to obtain the highest privileges on the system...

CVE-2020-29483

An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Xenstored and guests communicate via a shared memory page using a specific protocol. When a guest violates this protocol, xenstored will drop the connection to that guest. Unfortunately, this is done by just removing the guest from xenstored's intern...