Lucene search
+L

5361 matches found

Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•50 views

CVE-2023-48432

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration ZCS 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. XSS, with resultant session stealing, can occur via JavaScript code in a link for a webmail redirection endpoint within en email message, e.g., if a victim clicks on that link within Zimbra webmail...

6.9AI score0.00465EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•128 views

CVE-2023-45207

CVE-2023-45207 concerns Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) versions 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. An attacker could send a PDF with embedded JavaScript via email; when the PDF is previewed in webmail (Chrome), a stored XSS payload may execute. Documents consistently state that this has been mitigated by s...

6.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00474EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•20 views

CVE-2023-50808

Zimbra Collaboration before Kepler 9.0.0 Patch 38 GA allows DOM-based JavaScript injection in the Modern UI...

9.1CVSS7.1AI score
SaveExploits0References5
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•12 views

CVE-2023-26562

In Zimbra Collaboration ZCS 8.8.15 and 9.0, a closed account with 2FA and generated passwords can send e-mail messages when configured for Imap/smtp...

6.5CVSS6.9AI score
SaveExploits0References5
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•20 views

CVE-2023-50808

Zimbra Collaboration before Kepler 9.0.0 Patch 38 GA allows DOM-based JavaScript injection in the Modern UI...

9.4AI score0.00436EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•18 views

Zimbra Collaboration Suite Security Vulnerability

Zimbra Collaboration Suite ZCS is an open source collaboration suite from Zimbra in the United States. The product includes WebMail, Calendar, Address Book and more. A security vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration Suite versions 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. An attacker exploited the vulnerabili...

6.1CVSS6.7AI score0.00465EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•18 views

PT-2024-13974 · Zimbra · Zimbra Collaboration

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Zimbra Collaboration versions prior to Kepler 9.0.0 Patch 38 GA Description: The issue allows DOM-based JavaScript injection in the Modern UI. This could potentially lead to malicious script execution. No information is provided about the...

9.1CVSS7.3AI score0.00436EPSS
SaveExploits0References8
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•6 views

CVE-2023-45206: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration ZCS 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. Through the help document endpoint in webmail, an attacker can inject JavaScript or HTML code that leads to cross-site scripting XSS. Adding an adequate message to avoid malicious code will mitigate this issue...

6.1CVSS5.6AI score0.0041EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•5 views

CVE-2023-50808: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

Zimbra Collaboration before Kepler 9.0.0 Patch 38 GA allows DOM-based JavaScript injection in the Modern UI...

9.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00436EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•6 views

CVE-2023-26562: Missing Authorization

In Zimbra Collaboration ZCS 8.8.15 and 9.0, a closed account with 2FA and generated passwords can send e-mail messages when configured for Imap/smtp...

6.5CVSS5.7AI score0.00585EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•9 views

CVE-2023-48432: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration ZCS 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. XSS, with resultant session stealing, can occur via JavaScript code in a link for a webmail redirection endpoint within en email message, e.g., if a victim clicks on that link within Zimbra webmail...

6.1CVSS5.7AI score0.00465EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•118 views

CVE-2023-26562

In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) versions 8.8.15–9.0, a closed account (with 2FA and a generated password) can send email when Imap/smtp is configured. Red Hat and other connected sources describe a root cause related to insufficient account-status checks for 2FA accounts, enabling mail sending desp...

6.5CVSS6.8AI score0.00585EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/02/13 12:00 a.m.•21 views

CVE-2023-45207

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration ZCS 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. An attacker can send a PDF document through mail that contains malicious JavaScript. While previewing this file in webmail in the Chrome browser, the stored XSS payload is executed. This has been mitigated by sanitising th...

6.1CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References5
CISA
CISA
•added 2024/02/07 12:00 p.m.•29 views

CISA and Partners Release Advisory on PRC-sponsored Volt Typhoon Activity and Supplemental Living Off the Land Guidance

Today, CISA, the National Security Agency NSA, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI released a joint Cybersecurity Advisory CSA, PRC State-Sponsored Actors Compromise and Maintain Persistent Access to U.S. Critical Infrastructure alongside supplemental Joint Guidance: Identifying and...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0References5
CVE
CVE
•added 2024/02/06 3:58 p.m.•67 views

CVE-2024-23344

CVE-2024-23344 describes an information-disclosure risk in Tuleap where, during a multi-user permission validation, some users could access restricted information (e.g., contents of artifacts or email notifications). The issue is categorized as an authorization/bypass-type disclosure affecting Tu...

6.5CVSS6.3AI score0.0053EPSS
SaveExploits0References4Affected Software1
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2024/02/04 12:00 a.m.•117 views

Unspecified vulnerability in vantage6 (CNVD-2024-07865)

vantage6 is vantage6 open source an open source priVAcy preserviNg federalTed leArningG infrastructure for Secure Insight eXchange. A security vulnerability exists in vantage that stems from the fact that input is not checked to see if it is encrypted if the task is created in encrypted...

4.3CVSS6.7AI score0.00257EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
•added 2024/02/02 10:30 a.m.•46 views

Cloudzy Elevates Cybersecurity: Integrating Insights from Recorded Future to Revolutionize Cloud Security

Cloudzy, a prominent cloud infrastructure provider, proudly announces a significant enhancement in its cybersecurity landscape. This breakthrough has been achieved through a recent consultation with Recorded Future, a leader in providing real-time threat intelligence and cybersecurity analytics...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
The Coalfire Blog
The Coalfire Blog
•added 2024/01/31 4:23 p.m.•25 views

Guardians of IoT: Addressing IoT security vulnerabilities in electric vehicles and charging stations

The rise of electric vehicles EVs and charging infrastructure necessitates robust security measures, especially in the context of IoT integration. Explore the vulnerabilities in EV systems and potential risks, proposing mitigation strategies like firmware updates, user authentication, intrusion...

7.6AI score
SaveExploits0
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/01/30 8:56 p.m.•39 views

GHSA-RJMV-52MP-GJRR vantage6 may create unencrypted tasks in encrypted collaboration

Impact There are no checks on whether the input is encrypted if a task is created in an encrypted collaboration. Therefore, a user may accidentally create a task with sensitive input data that will then be stored unencrypted in a database. Workarounds This is not an issue with the normal workflow...

3.5CVSS4.3AI score0.00257EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2024/01/30 8:56 p.m.•43 views

vantage6 may create unencrypted tasks in encrypted collaboration

Impact There are no checks on whether the input is encrypted if a task is created in an encrypted collaboration. Therefore, a user may accidentally create a task with sensitive input data that will then be stored unencrypted in a database. Workarounds This is not an issue with the normal workflow...

4.3CVSS6.5AI score0.00257EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
Rows per page
Query Builder