9488 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-8510
CVE-2016-8510 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-8547
CVE-2016-8547 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2016-8558
CVE-2016-8558 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2016-8542
CVE-2016-8542 is rejected and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-6251
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-6251
CVE-2016-6251 was withdrawn (DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER); it does not represent an active vulnerability entry. Connected sources show that Mageia’s MGASA-2017-0024 documents CVE-2016-6251 alongside CVE-2016-6252, indicating shadow-utils-4.2.1 had potentially unsafe getlogin usage and an int...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in a "generally available" software product. Notes: none...
CVE-2017-6000
CVE-2017-6000 entry is rejected/not used per the Initial Description.
CVE-2017-6000
REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...