EUVD-2026-40371

OpenZiti through 2.0.0, fixed in commit 3027fdf, contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin identities with fine-grained enrollment management permissions to create enrollments for any identity, including the default administrator, because the ApplyCreate...

CVE-2026-58165 OpenZiti - Privilege Escalation to Admin via Unauthorized Enrollment Creation

OpenZiti through 2.0.0, fixed in commit 3027fdf, contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin identities with fine-grained enrollment management permissions to create enrollments for any identity, including the default administrator, because the ApplyCreate...

CVE-2026-58165 OpenZiti - Privilege Escalation to Admin via Unauthorized Enrollment Creation

OpenZiti through 2.0.0, fixed in commit 3027fdf, contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin identities with fine-grained enrollment management permissions to create enrollments for any identity, including the default administrator, because the ApplyCreate...

PT-2026-53916

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions OpenZiti versions prior to 2.0.1 Description A privilege escalation flaw exists in the controller enrollment management path. An authenticated non-admin identity with fine-grained enrollment management permissions can create enrollments for an...

PYSEC-2026-575 wolfSSL Python module vulnerable to Improper Authentication

A vulnerability in the handling of verifymode = CERTREQUIRED in the wolfssl Python package wolfssl-py causes client certificate requirements to not be fully enforced. Because the WOLFSSLVERIFYFAILIFNOPEERCERT flag was not included, the behavior effectively matched CERTOPTIONAL: a peer certificate...

Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-12490

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client...

GO-2026-5564 Open Cluster Management (OCM): Cross-cluster privilege escalation via improper Kubernetes client certificate renewal validation in open-cluster-management.io/ocm

Open Cluster Management OCM: Cross-cluster privilege escalation via improper Kubernetes client certificate renewal validation in open-cluster-management.io/ocm...

CVE-2026-55962

TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication PHA issue where a server could accept a client's Finished message without the client having sent a Certificate and CertificateVerify. The post-handshake-auth exemption that allows an empty/absent peer certificate was only intended for the initial handshake, b...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-55962

TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication PHA issue where a server could accept a client's Finished message without the client having sent a Certificate and CertificateVerify. The post-handshake-auth exemption that allows an empty/absent peer certificate was only intended for the initial handshake, b...

CVE-2026-55962

CVE-2026-55962 (WolfSSL) : TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication could allow a server to accept a client’s Finished message without a Certificate and CertificateVerify if a post-handshake CertificateRequest was outstanding. The fix scopes the check to the initial handshake: after certReqCtx is se...

CVE-2026-55962

TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication PHA issue where a server could accept a client's Finished message without the client having sent a Certificate and CertificateVerify. The post-handshake-auth exemption that allows an empty/absent peer certificate was only intended for the initial handshake, b...

CVE-2026-55962 TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication: server accepts Finished without client Certificate/CertificateVerify

TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication PHA issue where a server could accept a client's Finished message without the client having sent a Certificate and CertificateVerify. The post-handshake-auth exemption that allows an empty/absent peer certificate was only intended for the initial handshake, b...

DEBIAN-CVE-2026-55960

Un-negotiated Raw Public Key RFC 7250 accepted in place of an X.509 certificate, bypassing chain validation. A raw public key has no chain, so ParseCertRelative accepts it without performing any trust verification; it must therefore only be accepted when RPK was actually negotiated for that peer...

EUVD-2026-39185

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

ALPINE-CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...