Poor detection of disputed trees allows claiming tokens from a disputed tree

Lines of code Vulnerability details Targets Impact Users can claim rewards from a Merkle tree that's being disputed. This can potentially lead to loss of funds since a malicious trusted EOA can claim funds from a malicious tree while it's being disputed. Proof of Concept The...

Rage quitter loses his claimable share of distributed tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rage quitter loses his claimable share of distributed tokens. Proof of Concept PartyGovernanceNFT.rageQuit burns a governance NFT and transfers its share of the balance of ETH and tokens: // Burn caller's party card. This will revert if caller is not the...

CVE-2023-31241

Snap One OvrC cloud servers contain a route an attacker can use to bypass requirements and claim devices outright...

Information disclosure

Teltonika’s Remote Management System versions prior to 4.10.0 contain a function that allows users to claim their devices. This function returns information based on whether the serial number of a device has already been claimed, the MAC address of a device has already been claimed, or whether th...

Command injection

Teltonika’s Remote Management System versions prior to 4.10.0 use device serial numbers and MAC addresses to identify devices from the user perspective for device claiming and from the device perspective for authentication. If an attacker obtained the serial number and MAC address of a device, th...

CVE-2023-32347

Teltonika RMS and related RUT devices are affected by multiple CVEs (CVE-2023-32346/32347/32348/32349/32350, and 32358 in some sources) affecting authentication, device claiming, SSRF, remote code execution, and OS command injection. Affected: RMS versions prior to 4.10.0 (and 4.14.0 for CVE-2023...

CVE-2023-32346

Teltonika’s Remote Management System versions prior to 4.10.0 contain a function that allows users to claim their devices. This function returns information based on whether the serial number of a device has already been claimed, the MAC address of a device has already been claimed, or whether th...

PT-2023-23739 · Teltonika · Sygate Remote Management

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Teltonika’s Remote Management System versions prior to 4.10.0 Description: The issue concerns a function in the Remote Management System that allows users to claim devices, returning information based on whether a device's serial number or MA...

PT-2023-23262 · Snap One · Snap One Ovrc

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Snap One OvrC affected versions not specified Description: The issue concerns Snap One OvrC cloud servers, where an attacker can exploit a route to bypass requirements and claim devices outright. No information is provided about the estimated...

Snap One OvrC Cloud (Update A)

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v3 8.6 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Snap One Equipment: OvrC Cloud, OvrC Pro Devices Vulnerabilities: Improper Input Validation, Observable Response Discrepancy, Improper Access Control, Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information,...

It's not always possible for a user to claim their voting power in ReraiseETHCrowdfund

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept When a ReraiseETHCrowdfund has finalized, a user has 2 ways to claim their voting power - claim or claimMultiple. The condition in claim is that user's total contribution is no greater than the maxContribution. uint96 contribution = votingPower...

Contributors wouldn't claim their party cards from the finalized ReraiseETHCrowdfund by a malicious crowdfund creator.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact With the custom min/maxContributions settings, contributors wouldn't claim their part cards after the ReraiseETHCrowdfund was finalized. As a result, their funds will be locked inside the party forever because they can't claim from TokenDistributor witho...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #206 [1676531414343]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 206 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Issue 2: receipts are not burned upon claiming reward. In my opinion, current system of just claiming some tokens to be "used" has some downsides: in any claim check, users spend gas to iterate over these tokens too...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #329 [1675575934658]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 329 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Reentrancy issue on claim for Erc1155Quest There is a reentrancy issue when claiming ERC1155 tokens, that will you reenter before redeemedTokens is updated. Here is the callback Quest.solL114 Stick to the check effec...

claim can run out of gas

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the claim function runs out of gas, the caller can never claim any rewards without transferring the nfts to another address first Proof of Concept Currently, the claim function loops over the msg.senders NFT's. If this list ever becomes too large, the...

The way the winner claiming NFT is vulnerable to flashloan attack.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The way the winner claiming NFT is vulnerable to flashloan attack. Proof of Concept This kind of attack is similar to ApeCoin Airdrop attack. To determine who is winng the current drawing, there is a hashUserWon function: function hasUserWonaddress user...

Generalized frontrunning risk for claiming winnings due to request.currentChosenTokenId being public

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol:fulfillRandomWords called by Chainlink receives an array of random words, and uses it to choose a random offset by which the winning tokenId is selected. The chosen tokenId is stored on the public request variable in the...

Deciphering Value in Generative Art: Art Basel Miami Beach to Feature Tezos Blockchain NFTs

By Owais Sultan This year, visitors to the gallery will be able to mint and claim a featured generative art NFT in real time. This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Deciphering Value in Generative Art: Art Basel Miami Beach to Feature Tezos Blockchain NFTs...

Some users won't be able to burn their crowdfund token to get their voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User which is a contract who doesn't have a receive function can't burn his token to get the governance power, because ethOwed ether are transferred to him. This is correct even if ethOwed is 0. Tools Used Manual audit Recommended Mitigation Steps Consid...

Users Can Frontrun Calls to updateRewardsMetadata() And Claim Tokens Twice

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The updateRewardsMetadata function is called by the BribeVault contract by the admin role. The function will take a list of distributions which are used to update the associated reward metadata. It is expected that the merkle root will be updated to...