7 matches found
Samba 3.3.13 chain_reply 内存破坏漏洞
No description provided by source...
Samba chain_reply Memory Corruption (Linux x86)
$Id: chainreply.rb 9852 2010-07-17 01:28:27Z jduck $ This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. http://metasploit.com/framework/...
CVE-2010-1635
The chainreply function in process.c in smbd in Samba before 3.4.8 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service NULL pointer dereference and process crash via a Negotiate Protocol request with a certain 0x0003 field value followed by a Session Setup AndX request wit...
Null pointer dereference
The chainreply function in process.c in smbd in Samba before 3.4.8 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service NULL pointer dereference and process crash via a Negotiate Protocol request with a certain 0x0003 field value followed by a Session Setup AndX request wit...
CVE-2010-1635
The chainreply function in process.c in smbd in Samba before 3.4.8 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service NULL pointer dereference and process crash via a Negotiate Protocol request with a certain 0x0003 field value followed by a Session Setup AndX request wit...
CVE-2010-1635: Undefined Security Weakness
The chainreply function in process.c in smbd in Samba before 3.4.8 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service NULL pointer dereference and process crash via a Negotiate Protocol request with a certain 0x0003 field value followed by a Session Setup AndX request wit...
CVE-2010-2063: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Buffer overflow in the SMB1 packet chaining implementation in the chainreply function in process.c in smbd in Samba 3.0.x before 3.3.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service memory corruption and daemon crash or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted field in a packet...