Lucene search
K

56 matches found

RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2026/05/15 1:57 a.m.3 views

CVE-2026-44498

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to version 4.4.0, Zebra's block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit MAXBLOCKSIGOPS, allowing it to accept blocks that zcashd rejects with bad-blk-sigops. A miner who produces such a block...

9.2CVSS5.7AI score0.00013EPSS
Exploits0References1
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2026/01/09 9:35 a.m.5 views

CVE-2024-34478

btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of...

7.5CVSS6.7AI score0.00104EPSS
Exploits0References1
EUVD
EUVD
added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.1 views

EUVD-2021-1653

Malware in sbrugna...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.00289EPSS
Exploits0References8
EUVD
EUVD
added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.2 views

EUVD-2021-1275

Malware in sbrugna...

7.1CVSS6.5AI score0.00303EPSS
Exploits0References7
EUVD
EUVD
added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.2 views

EUVD-2021-1427

Malware in sbrugna...

5.3CVSS5.3AI score0.00267EPSS
Exploits0References11
EUVD
EUVD
added 2025/10/03 8:7 p.m.2 views

EUVD-2024-2904

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

8.1CVSS7.9AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References6
SUSE CVE
SUSE CVE
added 2025/08/08 11:40 p.m.2 views

SUSE CVE-2020-26241

Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. This is a Consensus vulnerability in Geth before version 1.9.17 which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth's pre-compiled dataCopy at 0x00...04 contract di...

7.1CVSS6.8AI score0.00303EPSS
Exploits0References2
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2025/05/22 6:41 p.m.3 views

CVE-2021-39137

go-ethereum is the official Go implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In affected versions a consensus-vulnerability in go-ethereum Geth could cause a chain split, where vulnerable versions refuse to accept the canonical chain. Further details about the vulnerability will be disclosed at a late...

7.5CVSS6.6AI score0.00289EPSS
Exploits0References1
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2025/05/22 3:46 p.m.11 views

CVE-2020-26265

Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In Geth from version 1.9.4 and before version 1.9.20 a consensus-vulnerability could cause a chain split, where vulnerable versions refuse to accept the canonical chain. The fix was included in the Paragade...

5.3CVSS6.8AI score0.00267EPSS
Exploits0
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2025/02/05 8:55 a.m.2 views

CVE-2024-38365

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go golang. The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can...

7.4CVSS6.6AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References1
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
added 2025/01/14 10:4 p.m.6 views

Lodestar snappy checksum issue

Impact Unintended permanent chain split affecting greater than or equal to 25% of the network, requiring hard fork network partition requiring hard fork Lodestar does not verify checksum in snappy framing uncompressed chunks. Vulnerability Details In Req/Resp protocol the messages are encoded by...

6.9AI score
Exploits0References3Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
added 2025/01/14 10:3 p.m.2 views

GHSA-53RV-HCVM-RPP9 Lodestar snappy decompression issue

Impact Unintended permanent chain split affecting greater than or equal to 25% of the network, requiring hard fork network partition requiring hard fork Description Lodestar client may fail to decode snappy framing compressed messages. Vulnerability Details In Req/Resp protocol the message are...

7AI score
Exploits0References3
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
added 2025/01/14 10:3 p.m.5 views

Lodestar snappy decompression issue

Impact Unintended permanent chain split affecting greater than or equal to 25% of the network, requiring hard fork network partition requiring hard fork Description Lodestar client may fail to decode snappy framing compressed messages. Vulnerability Details In Req/Resp protocol the message are...

7AI score
Exploits0References3Affected Software1
SUSE CVE
SUSE CVE
added 2024/11/02 3:55 a.m.1 views

SUSE CVE-2024-38365

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go golang. The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can...

8.1CVSS6.8AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References5
OSV
OSV
added 2024/10/15 6:38 p.m.9 views

GO-2024-3189 Consensus failure in github.com/btcsuite/btcd

The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's 'FindAndDelete' functionality, causing discrepancies in the validation of Bitcoin blocks. This can lead to a chain split accepting an invalid block or Denial of Service DoS attacks rejecting a valid block...

8.1CVSS7.2AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References4
NVD
NVD
added 2024/10/11 8:15 p.m.11 views

CVE-2024-38365

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go golang. The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can...

8.1CVSS0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References4
CVE
CVE
added 2024/10/11 7:32 p.m.103 views

CVE-2024-38365

CVE-2024-38365 affects btcd (versions 0.10 to 0.24). The issue is a mismatch in Bitcoin Core’s FindAndDelete() versus btcd’s removeOpcodeByData() that can cause btcd to validate blocks differently, risking a chain split (accepting an invalid block) or DoS (rejecting a valid block). The root cause...

8.1CVSS7.2AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References4Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
added 2024/10/11 7:32 p.m.7 views

CVE-2024-38365 btcd did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go golang. The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can...

7.4CVSS7.7AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References6
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2024/10/11 7:32 p.m.12 views

CVE-2024-38365 btcd did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go golang. The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can...

7.4CVSS6.6AI score0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References4
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2024/10/11 7:32 p.m.15 views

CVE-2024-38365 btcd did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go golang. The btcd Bitcoin client versions 0.10 to 0.24 did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can...

7.4CVSS0.00427EPSS
Exploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder