CVE-2016-3719

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8496. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8496. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8496 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

CVE-2015-3571

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-3571. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3571. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-3571 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

CVE-2015-4829

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0638. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0638. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0638 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6479. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-6479. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-6479 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7921. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-7921. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7921 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

CVE-2015-6264

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1349. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1349. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1349 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

CVE-2015-6264

CVE-2015-6264 is a reserved duplicate of CVE-2016-1349. Connected sources confirm a Cisco Smart Install client DoS in Cisco IOS 12.2/15.0/15.2 and IOS XE 3.2–3.7, exploitable remotely via crafted image-list parameters in a Smart Install packet, causing device reload. Remediation is via Cisco soft...

CVE-2016-2859

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0834. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0834. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0834 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0800. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0800. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1868. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1868. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1868 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

CVE-2015-3591

CVE-2015-3591 is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3591. The connected records provide concrete details for CVE-2014-3591: Libgcrypt (before 1.6.3) and GnuPG (before 1.4.19) do not implement ciphertext blinding for ElGamal decryption, enabling physically proximate attackers to potentially recover server pr...

Security feature bypass

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue requiring a CVE ID. Notes: none...

CVE-2016-0722

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0729. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0729. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0729 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

CVE-2015-7681

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn. Notes: none...

CVE-2015-6553

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none...

CVE-2015-2303

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6406. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6406. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6406 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...