Lucene search
+L

8988 matches found

ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/06/01 3:59 p.m.4 views

CVE-2014-2656

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that the vulnerability report was not valid. Notes: none...

5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References1
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/05/17 3:59 p.m.4 views

CVE-2016-3719

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
added 2016/05/09 10:59 a.m.28 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

7.5AI score0.00255EPSS
SaveExploits0
Prion
Prion
added 2016/04/29 10:59 p.m.17 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8496. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8496. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8496 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

6.8AI score0.02397EPSS
SaveExploits1
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/04/26 10:59 a.m.3 views

CVE-2015-3571

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-3571. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3571. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-3571 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

5CVSS6.6AI score0.22964EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/04/22 5:59 p.m.6 views

CVE-2015-4829

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0638. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0638. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0638 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

9.8CVSS7.3AI score0.62924EPSS
SaveExploits3References1
Prion
Prion
added 2016/04/21 11:0 a.m.19 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6479. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-6479. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-6479 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

4.8AI score0.01541EPSS
SaveExploits0
Prion
Prion
added 2016/04/07 10:59 a.m.14 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7921. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-7921. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7921 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

9.1AI score0.0197EPSS
SaveExploits0
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/04/01 10:59 p.m.3 views

CVE-2015-6264

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1349. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1349. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1349 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

7.8CVSS7.1AI score0.01985EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
added 2016/04/01 10:0 p.m.42 views

CVE-2015-6264

CVE-2015-6264 is a reserved duplicate of CVE-2016-1349. Connected sources confirm a Cisco Smart Install client DoS in Cisco IOS 12.2/15.0/15.2 and IOS XE 3.2–3.7, exploitable remotely via crafted image-list parameters in a Smart Install packet, causing device reload. Remediation is via Cisco soft...

7.5AI score
SaveExploits0
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/03/10 12:59 a.m.4 views

CVE-2016-2859

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0834. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0834. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0834 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

10CVSS7.3AI score0.01512EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
added 2016/03/03 12:59 a.m.28 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0800. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0800. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

6.9AI score0.82112EPSS
SaveExploits3
Prion
Prion
added 2016/02/27 11:59 a.m.5 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1868. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1868. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1868 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
CVE
CVE
added 2016/02/25 11:0 a.m.58 views

CVE-2015-3591

CVE-2015-3591 is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3591. The connected records provide concrete details for CVE-2014-3591: Libgcrypt (before 1.6.3) and GnuPG (before 1.4.19) do not implement ciphertext blinding for ElGamal decryption, enabling physically proximate attackers to potentially recover server pr...

5AI score
SaveExploits0
Prion
Prion
added 2016/02/23 5:59 a.m.14 views

Security feature bypass

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue requiring a CVE ID. Notes: none...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/02/18 3:59 p.m.4 views

CVE-2016-0722

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
added 2016/02/18 3:59 p.m.11 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Prion
Prion
added 2016/02/18 3:59 p.m.23 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0729. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0729. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0729 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

9.3AI score0.09115EPSS
SaveExploits0
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/02/10 3:59 p.m.4 views

CVE-2015-7681

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn. Notes: none...

5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References1
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2016/02/05 6:59 p.m.5 views

CVE-2015-6553

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none...

5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References1
Rows per page
Query Builder